Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Combination rules for inhibitory stimuli

J R Ison, M Zuckerman, J M Russo

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes

|October 1, 1975

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Sigmoidectomy following sigmoid volvulus: who is at risk of anastomotic failure?

Techniques in coloproctology·2021

Same author

Human parainfluenza virus type 3 infections in a haemato-oncology unit: social distancing measures needed in outpatient clinics.

The Journal of hospital infection·2021

Same author

Site-Specific Weather Information Without On-Site Sensors.

Plant disease·2019

Same author

Decision Support Systems: Quenching the Thirst.

Plant disease·2019

Same author

The Effect of Solar Irradiance on the Mortality of Phakopsora pachyrhizi Urediniospores.

Plant disease·2019

Same author

Predicting Soybean Rust Incursions into the North American Continental Interior Using Crop Monitoring, Spore Trapping, and Aerobiological Modeling.

Plant disease·2019

Same journal

The fate of redundant cues in human predictive learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013

Same journal

The adaptive analysis of visual cognition using genetic algorithms.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013

Same journal

Active change detection by pigeons and humans.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013

Same journal

Renewal effects in interference between outcomes as measured by a cued response reaction time task: further evidence for associative retrieval models.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013

Same journal

Pigeons use low rather than high spatial frequency information to make visual category discriminations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013

Same journal

Associative models of instrumental learning: a response to Dupuis and Dawson.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013

See all related articles

Startle reactions can be inhibited by preceding neutral or intense stimuli. Combining stimuli enhanced this inhibitory effect, suggesting independent or summative processes in the nervous system.

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Psychology
Behavioral Science

Background:

Startle reactions are a fundamental protective reflex.
Inhibition of startle responses can be modulated by preceding stimuli.
Understanding these modulatory mechanisms is crucial for neuroscience and psychology.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the combined effects of weak neutral and intense startle-eliciting stimuli on the inhibition of startle reactions.
To determine if the inhibitory effects of combined stimuli follow independent or summative processes.
To explore the underlying neural mechanisms, potentially involving the refractory period.

Main Methods:

Three experimental conditions were used: (a) two weak stimuli, (b) one weak and one intense stimulus, (c) two intense stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

Startle reactions were elicited and their inhibition measured.

The proportion of response inhibition was analyzed using probability rules for independent events.

Main Results:

Combined stimuli consistently produced greater response inhibition than individual stimuli across all conditions.
Conditions with weak and/or single intense stimuli showed inhibitory effects consistent with independent event probabilities.
The combination of two intense stimuli resulted in greater inhibition than predicted by independent events, suggesting a summative process.

Conclusions:

Combining stimuli enhances the inhibition of startle reactions.
The inhibitory mechanisms appear to involve independent processes for certain stimulus combinations.
Summative processes, possibly related to refractory period prolongation, may underlie the enhanced inhibition observed with intense stimulus combinations.