Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why pay extra for cesarean-section deliveries?

M D Finkler1, D D Wirtschafter

  • 1Lawrence University, Appleton, WI 54912-0599.

Inquiry : a Journal of Medical Care Organization, Provision and Financing
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Antibiotic use for presumed neonatally acquired infections far exceeds that for central line-associated blood stream infections: an exploratory critique.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2011
Same author

A statewide quality improvement collaborative to reduce neonatal central line-associated blood stream infections.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2009
Same author

One health maintenance organization's experience: obstetric costs depend more on staffing patterns than on mode of delivery.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·1997
Same author

Perinatal services in the era of managed care: a Kaiser Permanente physician's perspective.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·1995
Same author

Using health care outcomes to improve patient care in the NICU.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·1994
Same author

Cost-effectiveness and data envelopment analysis.

Health care management review·1993
Same journal

Designing Care Beyond the Hospital: Revealing Hidden Care Demands in Hospital-At-Home Services.

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·2026
Same journal

Fundamental Values in Nursing Care: The Person's Perspective.

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·2026
Same journal

Network Analysis of Healthcare Worker Burnout: Organizational Factors Show Highest Centrality.

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to: "A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of the Cure Violence Approach".

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·2026
Same journal

Nurse Influencers: The Digital Performance of Care, Professional Identity, and the Commodification of Empathy-An Integrative Narrative Review.

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·2026
Same journal

Digital Access and Primary Care Use in Chronic Disease Management: Preliminary Evidence From Three Caribbean Cities in Colombia.

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·2026
See all related articles

Third-party insurers pay significantly more for cesarean sections than vaginal births. Reducing national cesarean rates could save over $1 billion annually, prompting a review of obstetric payment structures.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Healthcare Policy

Background:

  • Cesarean sections (C-sections) incur higher costs for third-party insurers compared to vaginal deliveries.
  • Existing payment models may not adequately reflect the true costs or outcomes associated with different birth methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the financial implications of cesarean section rates on healthcare payers.
  • To evaluate the relationship between C-section rates, direct medical costs, and perinatal outcomes.
  • To inform optimal payment strategies for obstetric services.

Main Methods:

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis based on data from a single health maintenance organization (HMO).
  • Examination of the correlation between C-section rates and both direct healthcare expenditures and perinatal health indicators.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Cesarean sections are reimbursed at a premium of at least 50% over vaginal deliveries by third-party insurers.
  • No significant relationship was found between C-section rates and direct costs or perinatal outcomes within the studied population.
  • Potential annual savings exceeding $1 billion for payers if national C-section rates were reduced.

Conclusions:

  • Current payment structures for obstetric services may not align with cost-effectiveness or outcome data.
  • Insurers should consider adopting a flat-fee payment model for obstetric care.
  • Differential payments should be reserved for cases with demonstrably different risk levels or risk-adjusted outcomes.