Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Directed forgetting in animals

K L Roper1, T R Zentall

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506.

Psychological Bulletin
|May 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Animal studies on directed forgetting show performance disruptions depend on training cues and response patterns. Understanding these factors is key to animal memory research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Win-stay/lose-shift and win-shift/lose-stay learning by pigeons in the absence of overt response mediation.

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

Delayed matching in pigeons: can apparent memory loss be attributed to the delay of reinforcement of sample-orienting behavior?

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

Senile hyaline scleral plaques.

Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1929)·2010
Same author

Episodic-like memory in pigeons.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Imitative learning in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) depends on the motivational state of the observer quail at the time of observation.

Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)·2001
Same author

Development of a single-code/default coding strategy in pigeons.

Psychological science·2001
Same journal

Artificial intelligence as a partner in meta-analysis-Research agenda, user recommendations, and speed-accuracy tradeoffs: Commentary on Jansen et al. (2025).

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Relationships between cognition and daily functioning in adults with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

The association between reading anxiety and reading achievement: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Perfectionism is accelerating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analytic review of 35 years of college student data.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

High math anxiety is associated with lower math achievement across 90 countries: An individual participant data meta-analysis of representative student and adult samples.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Is thinking inherently unpleasant? A cautionary note on David, Vassena, and Bijleveld (2024).

Psychological bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Animal behavior
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Directed forgetting research in humans demonstrates the ability to selectively forget information.
  • Animal models offer insights into the mechanisms underlying memory and forgetting.
  • Previous animal studies on directed forgetting yielded mixed results, indicating the influence of specific training conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the conditions under which animals exhibit disrupted performance in directed forgetting tasks.
  • To identify key variables influencing directed forgetting in animal models.
  • To propose a framework for studying directed forgetting in animals analogous to human paradigms.

Main Methods:

  • Examined the impact of the 'forget' cue (F cue) signaling nonreward versus reward during training.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed the role of post-F cue response patterns in relation to the baseline memory task.
  • Proposed presenting to-be-remembered and to-be-forgotten material within a single trial.
  • Main Results:

    • Animal test performance disruptions in directed forgetting are conditional, not universal.
    • The nature of the F cue (nonreward vs. reward) significantly influences performance.
    • Post-F cue response compatibility with the memory task is a critical factor.

    Conclusions:

    • Directed forgetting effects in animals can be influenced by trained response biases and frustration-produced interference.
    • Methodologies for studying directed forgetting in animals should align with human experimental procedures.
    • Future research should incorporate within-trial presentation of both to-be-remembered and to-be-forgotten information.