Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups

J L Rogers1, K I Howard, J T Vessey

  • 1Department of Psychology, Wheaton College, Illinois 60187.

Psychological Bulletin
|May 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mortality trends from colorectal pathologies in the United States (1999-2020): a retrospective cohort study using CDC WONDER.

Techniques in coloproctology·2026
Same author

Discussion of: "Is it necessary to perform full pathologic review of all gastric remnants following sleeve gastrectomy?"

American journal of surgery·2017
Same author

Is it necessary to perform full pathologic review of all gastric remnants following sleeve gastrectomy?

American journal of surgery·2017
Same author

Multivariate Analysis Of Gang Delinquency: I. Ecologic Influences.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Multivariate Analysis Of Gang Delinquency: Iv. Personality Factors In Gangs And Clubs.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Direction Of Measurement And Profile Similarity.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same journal

Artificial intelligence as a partner in meta-analysis-Research agenda, user recommendations, and speed-accuracy tradeoffs: Commentary on Jansen et al. (2025).

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Relationships between cognition and daily functioning in adults with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

The association between reading anxiety and reading achievement: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Perfectionism is accelerating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analytic review of 35 years of college student data.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

High math anxiety is associated with lower math achievement across 90 countries: An individual participant data meta-analysis of representative student and adult samples.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Is thinking inherently unpleasant? A cautionary note on David, Vassena, and Bijleveld (2024).

Psychological bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Equivalency testing, a statistical method for determining drug equivalence, is presented to social scientists. This approach offers valuable insights for social science research and analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • Equivalency testing is a statistical method commonly used in biostatistics.
  • It is employed to determine if two experimental drugs demonstrate equivalent effects.
  • This method is not widely recognized or utilized within the social sciences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce equivalency testing to social scientists.
  • Demonstrate the applicability and usefulness of equivalency testing in social science research.
  • Provide examples of how equivalency testing can be applied in social contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Explanation of the statistical principles behind equivalency testing.
  • Presentation of practical examples relevant to social science research scenarios.
Keywords:
MeasurementMethodological StudiesResearch MethodologySocial SciencesSociometric TechnicsTesting

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion on the interpretation of results from equivalency tests.

    • Main Results:

    • Equivalency testing can be effectively applied to social science data.
    • The method provides a robust framework for comparing social interventions or programs.
    • Examples illustrate how to assess the practical equivalence of different social treatments.

    Conclusions:

    • Equivalency testing offers a valuable statistical tool for social scientists.
    • Its adoption can enhance the rigor of comparative research in social sciences.
    • The method facilitates evidence-based decision-making in social policy and practice.