Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Limb-segment selection in drawing behaviour

R G Meulenbroek1, D A Rosenbaum, A J Thomassen

  • 1Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information, The Netherlands.

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|May 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The posture-based motion planning model from cognitive psychology may prove useful for physics-based character animation: Comment on "Physics-based character animation and human motor control" by J. Llobera & C. Charbonnier.

Physics of life reviews·2023
Same author

Prevalence and Incidence of Microhemorrhages in Adolescent Football Players.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2020
Same author

Injury risk due to collisions in Major League Baseball.

International journal of sports medicine·2014
Same author

Rule use in character classification: Are serial and parallel processing discrete?

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Estimation of injury simulation in international men's soccer.

International journal of sports medicine·2010
Same author

Finding final postures.

Journal of motor behavior·2009
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

This study reveals how the brain selects limb segments for movement by considering optimal motion, preferred axes, and prior usage. These findings explain adaptive limb coordination in physical tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Motor control
  • Biomechanics
  • Human movement science

Background:

  • Understanding how the human motor system selects limb segments for tasks is crucial.
  • Existing theories propose factors like optimal motion, preferred axes, and task history influence this selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the determinants of limb-segment selection in a graphic production task.
  • To test hypotheses regarding optimal motion amplitudes/frequencies, preferred movement axes, and limb-segment recruitment inertia.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a graphic production task involving back-and-forth drawing movements with varying amplitudes.
  • Employed Selspot recordings to track the contributions of fingers, hand, and arm to pen displacement.
  • Analyzed the temporal sequence of limb-segment involvement during movement execution.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Confirmed that optimal motion characteristics (amplitude, frequency) influence limb-segment choice.
  • Demonstrated that preferred movement axes significantly impact which limb segments are recruited.
  • Showed a tendency for previously recruited limb segments to be reused, affecting selection.

Conclusions:

  • Limb-segment coordination is adaptively linked to the biomechanical properties of the motor system.
  • Movement selection is influenced by the computational demands of coordinating multiple effectors.
  • The findings provide insight into the neural control of goal-directed movements.