Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Polygraph lie detection on real events in a laboratory setting

M T Bradley1, M C Cullen

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, Canada.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|June 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

This study used embarrassing personal stories to test lie detection accuracy. Researchers found that individuals were more easily identified as deceptive when lying about their own experiences compared to truthful denials.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temperature effects on polygraph detection of concealed information.

Psychophysiology·2015
Same author

Cognitive and emotional reactions to questions in the Comparison Question Test.

Perceptual and motor skills·2014
Same author

Accuracy of effect size estimates from published psychological experiments involving multiple trials.

The Journal of general psychology·2014
Same author

Alpha values as a function of sample size, effect size, and power: accuracy over inference.

Psychological reports·2013
Same author

Memory instructions, vocalization, mock crimes, and concealed information tests with a polygraph.

Perceptual and motor skills·2012
Same author

Characterization of nutrient-induced dispersion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm.

Journal of bacteriology·2004

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Forensic Science

Background:

  • Lie detection research often relies on mock crimes, which may not accurately reflect real-world scenarios.
  • Intense emotional events can influence physiological responses relevant to deception detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the efficacy of using real-life embarrassing stories as stimuli in laboratory-based lie detection studies.
  • To compare the detectability of deception when individuals lie about their own experiences versus denying fabricated ones.

Main Methods:

  • Participants generated personally embarrassing stories and were subjected to polygraph testing.
  • Subjects denied their own embarrassing stories (lying) and denied randomly assigned stories (truthful denial).
  • Control Question Tests were administered by an examiner blind to the participants' conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Polygraph testing revealed significantly higher detectability of deception when participants were lying about their own embarrassing experiences.
  • The order of story presentation influenced detection rates, with lying on the second story being more easily detected than on the first.
  • Monetary incentives were provided to encourage participants to be judged innocent.

Conclusions:

  • Real-life embarrassing stories serve as a viable and potentially more ecologically valid alternative to mock crimes for studying lie detection.
  • The findings suggest that emotional salience of the event impacts the physiological indicators of deception.
  • Further research can explore the nuances of emotional intensity and its role in polygraph accuracy.