Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Measuring Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) Activity in Children
Published on: April 29, 2013
Cardiac pacing problems in infants and children: results of a 4-year prospective study
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Ky 40292.
Insights
A 2.5 V amplitude setting is unsafe for pediatric patients with non-steroid epicardial ventricular leads within 20 weeks post-implantation due to exit block. Steroid-tip leads are recommended to prevent pacing issues.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Cardiac pacing is crucial for pediatric patients with heart rhythm disorders.
- Evaluating pacing parameters like amplitude is essential for safety and efficacy.
- Exit block (EB) is a potential complication affecting pacing function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and effectiveness of a 2.5 V amplitude setting in pediatric cardiac pacing.
- To identify factors influencing pacing thresholds and exit block in pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 29 pediatric patients with a mean follow-up of 16.4 months.
- Analysis of pacing thresholds and exit block at a 2.5 V amplitude setting.
- Comparison of lead types (epicardial vs. endocardial, steroid-tip vs. non-steroid-tip) and lead positions (ventricular vs. atrial).
Main Results:
- Exit block (EB) at 2.5 V occurred in 26% of leads, with no new cases after 20 weeks.
- Ventricular leads (39%) and epicardial leads (47%) showed higher EB rates than atrial (8%) and endocardial (4%) leads, respectively.
- Steroid-tip leads demonstrated no exit block and lower mean pulse width thresholds (PWT) for endocardial ventricular leads.
Conclusions:
- A 2.5 V amplitude is not safe for non-steroid epicardial ventricular leads in children within 20 weeks post-implantation.
- Recommended pacing approach includes 5.0 V amplitude for epicardial leads initially and prioritizing endocardial steroid-tip leads.
- Steroid-tip technology significantly reduces the risk of exit block in pediatric cardiac pacing.
Abstract:
To evaluate cardiac pacing thresholds and the safety of a 2.5 V amplitude setting, we prospectively studied 29 pediatric patients during a mean follow-up of 16.4 months. Exit block (EB) at 2.5 V was confirmed during threshold analysis in 26% of 58 leads. No new cases were detected by threshold analysis after 20 weeks postimplantation. Exit block at 2.5 V occurred 4 times more frequently with ventricular than with atrial leads (39% vs 8%) and 11 times more frequently with epicardial than with endocardial leads (47% vs 4%). There was no relationship between intraoperative thresholds and EB during follow-up pacemaker checkups. The mean pulse width threshold (PWT) for endocardial ventricular leads was lower for steroid-tip than for non-steroid-tip leads (0.08 + 0.01 msec vs 0.28 + 0.04 msec). Exit block did not occur with steroid-tip leads. We conclude that during the first 20 weeks after implantation, a 2.5 V amplitude is not safe in children paced by means of nonsteroid epicardial ventricular leads. Our approach to pacing in children includes (1) 5.0 V amplitude for epicardial leads during the first 20 weeks after implantation and (2) use of endocardial steroid-tip leads whenever possible.
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:
Mechanism of Cardiac Arrhythmias

