Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modulation detection interference: some spectral effects

S P Bacon1, B C Moore

  • 1Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-1908.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|June 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterization of transient noise in Advanced LIGO relevant to gravitational wave signal GW150914.

Classical and quantum gravity·2020
Same author

GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO.

Physical review. D. (2016)·2020
Same author

Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA.

Living reviews in relativity·2018
Same author

Bioavailability and uptake of smelter emissions in freshwater zooplankton in northeastern Washington, USA lakes using Pb isotope analysis and trace metal concentrations.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2018
Same author

First Search for Nontensorial Gravitational Waves from Known Pulsars.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2.

Physical review letters·2017
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated amplitude modulation (AM) detection interference. Adding more than two masker frequencies did not significantly increase interference, suggesting limited within-channel effects in auditory perception.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal processing

Background:

  • Auditory masking can interfere with the detection of amplitude modulation (AM).
  • Understanding interference effects is crucial for auditory modeling and hearing aid design.
  • Previous research suggests within-channel and across-channel mechanisms contribute to masking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of masker complexity on the detection threshold of 10-Hz AM.
  • To determine the role of within-channel effects (spread of excitation) in modulation detection interference.
  • To examine the influence of masker harmonicity on interference effects.

Main Methods:

  • Measured detection thresholds for 10-Hz AM of a 2000-Hz carrier.
  • Used maskers with one to ten carrier frequencies, either unmodulated or modulated at 10 Hz.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Varied masker carrier frequencies relative to the signal carrier (harmonic and nonharmonic).

    • Main Results:

    • Masker modulation did not significantly alter interference patterns, indicating within-channel effects.
    • A two-frequency masker caused more interference than a single masker.
    • Increasing masker carriers beyond two yielded minimal additional interference.
    • Harmonicity of masker carriers did not substantially impact interference size.

    Conclusions:

    • Within-channel effects, like spread of excitation, play a role in modulation detection interference.
    • The number of masker carriers has a limited impact on interference beyond two frequencies.
    • Harmonic relationships between masker and signal carriers are not critical for modulation detection interference.