Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Physician judgment in clinical settings: methodological influences and cognitive performance

N V Dawson1

  • 1Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44109-1998.

Clinical Chemistry
|July 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Physicians' intuitive judgments are crucial for medical decisions, but cognitive biases can impair prediction accuracy. Understanding these limitations is key to improving clinical decision-making quality.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fetal, neonatal and infant death and their relationship to best gestational age for delivery at term: is 39 weeks best for everyone?

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2014
Same author

Health service research: the square peg in human subjects protection regulations.

Journal of medical ethics·2010
Same author

The cost of pneumonia after acute stroke.

Neurology·2007
Same author

Physician experience caring for dying patients and its relationship to patient outcomes.

Journal of palliative medicine·2005
Same author

The effect of pneumonia on mortality among patients hospitalized for acute stroke.

Neurology·2003
Same author

Reporting BRCA test results to primary care physicians.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2001

Area of Science:

  • Medical Decision-Making
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Informatics

Background:

  • Physicians' intuitive judgments are fundamental to clinical tasks like diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.
  • Assessing the quality of these judgments requires evaluating prediction data, methods, and accuracy.
  • Inaccurate predictions can stem from data uncertainty, methodological flaws, and cognitive limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the factors influencing the quality of physicians' intuitive predictions.
  • To explore cognitive biases that may impede accurate probability estimation in clinical settings.
  • To deepen the understanding of intuitive versus analytical approaches in medical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Review of literature on cognitive biases and their impact on medical judgment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of factors affecting predictive accuracy in clinical tasks.
  • Examination of heuristics and biases in physicians' decision-making processes.

    • Main Results:

    • Cognitive heuristics (e.g., availability, representativeness) and biases (e.g., ego, regret) can significantly impair physicians' probability estimations.
    • Factors known to bias test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity) can also bias intuitive judgments.
    • Limitations in the intuitive use of information (cognitive biases) are evident in both medical and nonmedical contexts.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding cognitive biases is essential for improving the accuracy of physicians' intuitive judgments.
    • Recognizing and mitigating these biases can enhance the reliability of medical decision-making.
    • A balanced approach, considering both intuitive and analytical methods, is crucial for optimal clinical outcomes.