Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Screening rules for determining blood pressure status in clinical trials. Application to the trials of hypertension
1Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02215.
Insights
New methods for multistage blood pressure screening can efficiently identify clinical trial participants. These approaches reduce clinic visits by 27% compared to no screening, improving trial efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Cardiovascular Health
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Multistage blood pressure screening is crucial for selecting participants in clinical trials.
- Current screening methods often require multiple visits, impacting efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present novel methods for blood pressure screening in clinical trials.
- To evaluate the efficiency of these new methods compared to existing ones.
Main Methods:
- The study introduces predictive value and empirical predictive value approaches.
- These methods utilize the distribution of underlying blood pressure or observed means.
- Data from the Trials of Hypertension Prevention Phase I were analyzed.
Main Results:
- The proposed methods reduce the number of required clinic screening visits by 27% compared to no screening.
- The standard screening rule requires twice as many visits as no screening.
- The predictive value approaches are more efficient than the standard rule.
Conclusions:
- The presented methods offer an efficient way to identify eligible subjects for hypertension clinical trials.
- These approaches optimize resource allocation by reducing necessary screening visits.
Abstract:
Multistage blood pressure screening rules are often used to select subjects for clinical trials. Multiple blood pressure readings are taken over successive visits, and the subject must meet eligibility criteria at each visit. In this paper, the authors present methods which depend on the distribution of the subject's underlying blood pressure values (the predictive value approach) or, alternatively, the subject's observed mean over all screening visits (the empirical predictive value approach) given the observed mean after one or more visits. The authors apply these methods to data from Phase I of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention, which attempts to identify subjects with mean diastolic blood pressures in the range 80-89 mmHg over three screening visits. The estimated efficiency of these rules is evaluated in terms of the number of clinic screening visits needed per eligible subject. Relative to reexamining all subjects at each visit (no screening), these approaches can reduce the number of visits required by 27%. This is in contrast to the standard rule in which a subject must have an observed mean diastolic blood pressure of 80-89 mmHg on each of three consecutive visits, which requires twice as many clinic visits per eligible subject as not screening. Thus, the approach presented is useful in identifying eligible subjects for clinical trials in an efficient manner.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Hypertension I: Introduction
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
