Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating the 95% effective defibrillation dose

R A Malkin1, D S Burdick, E E Johnson

  • 1Duke University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Durham, NC 27706.

IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering
|March 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perspectives on the Low Demand Transitional Model in Engaging and Housing hard-to-reach Veterans Experiencing Unsheltered Homelessness.

Community mental health journal·2025
Same author

Proximity to a high traffic road: glucocorticoid and life history consequences for nestling white-crowned sparrows.

General and comparative endocrinology·2011
Same author

The permanently patent (P.P.) intravenous needle.

British journal of anaesthesia·2010
Same author

[Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation].

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie·2009
Same author

[Not Available].

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie·2009
Same author

Epicardial wavefronts arise from widely distributed transient sources during ventricular fibrillation in the isolated swine heart.

New journal of physics·2008

New Minimum Squared Error (MinSE) protocols and an estimator accurately determine the effective defibrillation dose 95 (ED95). This method provides reliable voltage estimates for implantable defibrillators, improving patient safety.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Device Testing
  • Cardiac Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of the effective defibrillation dose 95 (ED95) is crucial for implantable defibrillator efficacy.
  • Existing methods may lack precision in determining the optimal voltage for successful defibrillation.
  • Standardized and reliable testing protocols are needed for device calibration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce Minimum Squared Error (MinSE) testing protocols and an estimator for accurate ED95 determination.
  • To validate the MinSE approach using a prospective study with implantable defibrillator electrodes and biphasic waveforms.
  • To assess the impact of population distribution assumptions on ED95 estimation accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Development of MinSE testing protocols presented as lookup tables for successful and unsuccessful defibrillation trials.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing statistical analysis for dose-response curve selection and ED95 population distribution assumptions.
  • Prospective study involving five dogs with nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator electrodes and biphasic waveforms.

    • Main Results:

    • The MinSE estimator achieved a measured root-mean-square error of 15% of the mean ED95 for four test shocks.
    • ED95 estimation accuracy improved by 3.8% when population distribution assumptions were specific to species, size, and device parameters.
    • The MinSE approach demonstrated its applicability to various defibrillation parameter estimation challenges.

    Conclusions:

    • MinSE protocols and estimators provide accurate and reliable methods for determining the ED95 for defibrillation.
    • The accuracy of ED95 estimates can be further enhanced by refining population distribution assumptions.
    • The MinSE approach offers a flexible framework extendable to diverse defibrillation testing scenarios.