Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Morphologic analysis of tissue-expander shape using a biomechanical model

D C Hammond1, L C Perry, G P Maxwell

  • 1Institute for Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Baptist Hospital, Nashville, Tenn.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|August 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

International multidisciplinary expert panel consensus on breast reconstruction and radiotherapy.

The British journal of surgery·2019
Same author

Deconvolution technique for line-of-sight optical scattering measurements in axisymmetric sprays.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Breast asymmetry.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2009
Same author

Treatment of chronic fatigue with neurofeedback and self-hypnosis.

NeuroRehabilitation·2002
Same author

The polyurethane-covered mammary prosthesis: facts and fiction (II): a look back and a "peek" ahead.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2001
Same author

Introduction to the special section: hypnosis and EMDR. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing.

The American journal of clinical hypnosis·2001
Same journal

Building Practical Artificial Intelligence Tools For The Plastic Surgeon: A Step-By-Step Guide To Cowork.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Interpretation Matters: Common Statistical Pitfalls in Retrospective Surgical Research.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

"Inferior Repositioning of the High-Riding Nipple Using a Parenchymal-Based Flap".

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

A Four-Step Strategy for the Treatment of Facial Rhytids: A Focus on Upper Facial Wrinkles.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Long-Term Retention of Fresh-Frozen Costal Cartilage Allograft in An Animal Model.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Manual extrusion of fat granules for primary thinning of a bulky flap.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
See all related articles

Anatomically shaped tissue expanders provide better chest wall contours than round designs. Future designs should aim to reduce maximal projection and upper pole deformity for improved aesthetic outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanical modeling
  • Plastic and reconstructive surgery
  • Medical device design

Background:

  • Current tissue expanders, both round and anatomically shaped, are widely used in reconstructive surgery.
  • Evaluating the biomechanical performance and aesthetic outcomes of different tissue expander designs is crucial for surgical success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To biomechanically evaluate the chest wall contours produced by various round and anatomically shaped tissue expanders.
  • To identify key parameters for assessing tissue expander shape and performance.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a biomechanical model simulating chest wall soft tissue forces.
  • Evaluation of expander contours using defined shape parameters, including maximal projection and upper pole deformity percentage.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Direct comparison of seven different tissue expander models.

    • Main Results:

    • Anatomically shaped tissue expanders demonstrated superior chest wall contours compared to traditional round designs.
    • Maximal projection point and percentage of upper pole deformity were identified as critical shape parameters.
    • Significant variations in contour outcomes were observed among the evaluated expander models.

    Conclusions:

    • Anatomically shaped tissue expanders offer improved aesthetic results in chest wall reconstruction.
    • Future tissue expander design modifications should prioritize minimizing maximal projection and upper pole deformity.
    • Biomechanical modeling provides a valuable tool for optimizing medical device design in reconstructive surgery.