Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Open colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy: are there differences?

A J Senagore1, M A Luchtefeld, J M Mackeigan

  • 1Department of Surgery, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

The American Surgeon
|August 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A prospective, randomized assessment of a novel, local antibiotic releasing platform for the prevention of superficial and deep surgical site infections.

Techniques in coloproctology·2022
Same author

Perioperative hyperglycemia: an unmet need within a surgical site infection bundle.

Techniques in coloproctology·2018
Same author

COMPRES: a prospective postmarketing evaluation of the compression anastomosis ring CAR 27(™) /ColonRing(™).

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2014
Same author

Cost of practice in a tertiary/quaternary referral center: is it sustainable?

Techniques in coloproctology·2014
Same author

Enhanced recovery protocol: implementation at a county institution with limited resources.

The American surgeon·2012
Same author

System-based factors influencing intraoperative decision-making in rectal cancer by surgeons: an international assessment.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2012
Same journal

Impact of Ceftriaxone on the Incidence of Early VAP in Patients With TBI and Multisystem Trauma.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Physiologic Status at Cannulation Is Associated With Survival in Trauma Patients Receiving ECMO.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Robotic Resection of Type 2 Klatskin's Tumor With Portal Vein Lateral Venorrhaphy and Dual Hepaticojejunostomy Biliary Reconstruction.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence in Everyday Surgical Practice: A Practical Review.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

What the Salary Rankings Miss About Pediatric Surgery: Readiness, Not Compensation.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Contrast Without Clarity: The Questionable Role of Oral Contrast in Detecting Missed Hollow Viscus Injury.

The American surgeon·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic colectomy shows similar safety to open surgery for colon issues, with less blood loss but longer operating times. Further research is needed on cost-effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic colectomy is gaining traction for colon conditions.
  • Limited data exists on its perioperative risks and cost-effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the initial year's experience with laparoscopic colon resection.
  • To compare laparoscopic versus open colectomy in terms of outcomes and costs.

Main Methods:

  • A consecutive series of 140 elective colonic resections were analyzed.
  • Data included patient demographics, surgical technique (open, laparoscopic, converted), complications, and operative details.
  • Indications ranged from adenocarcinoma to diverticular disease and inflammatory bowel disease.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • No significant differences in age or perioperative morbidity were observed between open and laparoscopic groups.
  • Laparoscopic colectomy resulted in significantly less intraoperative blood loss compared to open procedures.
  • Laparoscopic and converted cases had longer operating times than open laparotomy.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic colectomy is a viable option for colonic pathology with comparable safety to open surgery.
  • Reduced blood loss is a key advantage of the laparoscopic approach.
  • Increased operative time for laparoscopic colectomy warrants further investigation regarding efficiency and cost.