Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026
07:31
Murine Drinking Models in the Development of Pharmacotherapies for Alcoholism: Drinking in the Dark and Two-bottle Choice
Published on: January 7, 2019
Privatization, price and cross-border liquor purchases
1Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.
Journal of Studies on Alcohol
|July 1, 1993
Summary
Privatizing liquor sales did not significantly alter out-of-state liquor purchases, even with a 6.1% price increase. This study examined self-reported purchasing behavior after Iowa
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Economics
- Consumer Behavior
Background:
- State-level alcohol sales policies significantly impact consumer purchasing patterns.
- Understanding the economic and behavioral consequences of alcohol privatization is crucial for public health policy.
- Previous research has yielded mixed results on the effects of alcohol sales deregulation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of liquor sales privatization on cross-border liquor purchasing.
- To analyze changes in self-reported liquor consumption patterns following retail spirits sales privatization in Iowa.
Main Methods:
- Utilized self-report survey data from a representative sample of Iowa adults (age 18+).
- Conducted interviews approximately 25 months post-privatization to capture long-term effects.
- Analyzed changes in cross-border liquor purchase behavior in relation to price fluctuations.
Main Results:
- A 6.1% increase in retail liquor prices was observed post-privatization.
- Despite the price increase, there was minimal to no change in self-reported out-of-state liquor purchases.
- Consumer purchasing behavior remained largely unaffected by the privatization policy.
Conclusions:
- Liquor sales privatization in Iowa did not lead to a significant shift in cross-border purchasing.
- Price increases resulting from privatization did not deter consumers from purchasing alcohol out-of-state.
- Policy changes in alcohol retail structures may have limited impact on established cross-border purchasing habits.
