Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An expert system intervention for smoking cessation

W F Velicer1, J O Prochaska, J M Bellis

  • 1Cancer Prevention Research Consortium, University of Rhode Island, Kingston 02881.

Addictive Behaviors
|May 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility of yoga as a complementary therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes: The Healthy Active and in Control (HA1C) study.

Complementary therapies in medicine·2019
Same author

Cross-Sectional Time Series Designs: A General Transformation Approach.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Factors Influencing Four Rules For Determining The Number Of Components To Retain.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

An Empirical Comparison Of The Similarity Of Principal Component, Image, And Factor Patterns.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

A Comparison Of Component And Factor Patterns: A Monte Carlo Approach.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Testing Pattern Hypotheses On Correlation Matrices: Alternative Statistics And Some Empirical Results.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same journal

Daily patterns of opioid and stimulant use and associated risk-behavior outcomes: A cohort study.

Addictive behaviors·2026
Same journal

Changes in gambling behaviour and harm across the adult population, among priority groups, and by population subgroups in Great Britain, 2021-2024: Repeat cross-sectional annual survey.

Addictive behaviors·2026
Same journal

Life satisfaction across patterns of cigarette and e-cigarette use among adolescents: evidence from a national school-based survey.

Addictive behaviors·2026
Same journal

The prospective relationship between craving and the likelihood of "unknown" substance use motive endorsement.

Addictive behaviors·2026
Same journal

An evaluation of anxiety and depressive symptoms in terms of smoking among Black adults.

Addictive behaviors·2026
Same journal

Loot box purchases are associated with problem gambling severity and harms beyond traditional gambling activities.

Addictive behaviors·2026
See all related articles

Expert systems enhance intervention efficacy by matching treatments to client needs. This computer-based approach offers a cost-effective, viable method for behavior change interventions like smoking cessation.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Science
  • Health Informatics
  • Communication Theory

Background:

  • Intervention efficacy is maximized through personalized treatment matching.
  • Expert systems offer a novel approach by integrating client data for tailored interventions.
  • This method combines the benefits of clinic-based personalization with public health cost-effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the implementation of expert systems in intervention design.
  • To present the theoretical model and empirical basis for expert systems.
  • To detail a specific expert system intervention for smoking cessation and evaluate its efficacy.

Main Methods:

  • Discussed alternative expert system implementations within communication theory.
  • Described the theoretical model and empirical evidence underpinning the expert system.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Detailed a computer-driven expert system for smoking cessation.
  • Presented empirical results comparing the expert system to three alternative interventions.

    • Main Results:

    • The expert system intervention was evaluated against three alternative methods.
    • Empirical data demonstrated the effectiveness of the expert system approach.
    • The study provided evidence for the viability and efficacy of expert systems in behavior change.

    Conclusions:

    • Expert systems represent a cost-effective and efficacious intervention strategy.
    • This approach offers a viable means for addressing specific problem behaviors.
    • Further development and implications of expert systems in public health are discussed.