Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Are there ecological limits to population?

¹International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

|August 1, 1993

Summary

Biology and economics differ in their approaches to population and environment policy. Understanding these differences, particularly regarding ecological impacts and market-driven substitutions, is crucial for developing effective environmental strategies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Changing vital rates and age distributions.

Population studies·2011

Same author

Migration as a means of population control.

Population studies·2011

Same author

Individual mobility in a stationary population.

Population studies·2011

Same author

Finite approximations in demography.

Population studies·2011

Same author

Age distribution and the stable equivalent.

Demography·2011

Same author

A unified approach to interpolation and graduation.

Demography·2011

Area of Science:

Interdisciplinary studies bridging biology and economics.
Environmental policy and population dynamics.

Background:

Current population and environment policies lack decisive direction due to disciplinary disagreements.
Biology and economics, the primary fields involved, possess distinct methodologies and traditions.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify key differences between biological and economic perspectives on population and environment.
To highlight eight specific axes of divergence in methods and traditions between biology and economics.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of disciplinary approaches.
Examination of differing perspectives on concepts like contingency, progress, substitutability, and the commodity cycle.

Main Results:

Biology emphasizes contingency and natural catastrophes, while economics focuses on orderly progress.
Economics assumes indefinite market-driven substitutability, whereas biologists are skeptical.
Ecology considers the entire commodity cycle, including post-consumer impacts, which are often overlooked in economics.

Conclusions:

Disciplinary divergence hinders effective environmental policy.
Further interdisciplinary study can lead to unified policy recommendations for population and environment issues.

Related Experiment Videos