Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stationary and automated laparoscopically assisted technologies

M E Moran1

  • 1Department of Urology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento.

Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery
|June 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic surgery camera control can be improved using mechanical or robotic arms. These systems aim to provide a stable visual field, potentially enhancing surgical precision and outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating the impact of temperatures and exposure times on probiotics viability under pre- and post- technological processes.

Journal of microbiological methods·2025
Same author

Scleroderma and evidence based non-pharmaceutical treatment modalities for digital ulcers: a systematic review.

Journal of wound care·2014
Same author

A phase I/II study of rituximab and etanercept in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma.

Leukemia·2009
Same author

Filgrastim and alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) for refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Leukemia·2005
Same author

Dynamic lymphoscintigraphy for staging scrotal carcinoma.

The Journal of urology·2001
Same author

Controversial cases in endourology.

Journal of endourology·2000

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Technology
  • Robotics in Medicine

Background:

  • Laparoscopic surgery requires a stable visual field for optimal outcomes.
  • Maintaining a consistent view can be challenging due to patient anatomy variations.
  • A dedicated assistant is typically needed for camera operation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of automated camera systems in laparoscopy.
  • To compare mechanical and robotic arm systems for laparoscopic camera assistance.
  • To explore the potential of these technologies to replace a human assistant.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the theory behind mechanical and robotic camera arm systems.
  • Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each system.
  • Discussion of clinical utilization and case studies.

Main Results:

  • Mechanical and robotic arms offer potential solutions for maintaining a stable visual field.
  • These systems can potentially free up human surgical assistants for other tasks.
  • Clinical implementation requires careful consideration of system integration and surgeon training.

Conclusions:

  • Automated camera systems show promise in improving laparoscopic surgery.
  • Further research and development are needed to optimize their integration and widespread adoption.
  • Robotic and mechanical arms represent a significant advancement in surgical assistance technology.

Related Experiment Videos