Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pharmacy practice acts: a five-year follow-up

M A Munger1, W J Stilling, S F Gardner

  • 1College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112.

The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
|May 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient preferences for healthcare delivery through community pharmacy settings in the USA: A discrete choice study.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2017
Same author

Adherence to controller asthma medications: 6-month prevalence across a US community pharmacy chain.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2015
Same author

Aliskiren for geriatric lowering of systolic hypertension: a randomized controlled trial.

Journal of human hypertension·2009
Same author

Interdisciplinary didactic instruction at academic health centers in the United States: attitudes and barriers.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2003
Same author

Salmeterol and inhaled corticosteroids in patients with persistent asthma.

JAMA·2002
Same author

24-Hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in primary care.

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice·2001
Same journal

Severe Phototoxic Skin Reaction Associated With Vandetanib: Implications for Pharmaceutical Care.

The Annals of pharmacotherapy·2026
Same journal

Efficacy and Safety of Oral PCSK9 Inhibitors in Adults With Hypercholesterolemia: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs.

The Annals of pharmacotherapy·2026
Same journal

RSVpreF: A Vaccine for the Respiratory Syncytial Virus.

The Annals of pharmacotherapy·2026
Same journal

Severe Acute Hepatitis Induced by Combined Rosuvastatin and Ticagrelor Therapy Post-PCI: The Challenges of Multi-Drug DILI Diagnosis.

The Annals of pharmacotherapy·2026
Same journal

Modified vs Full Lead-in Dose Apixaban and Rivaroxaban for Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism.

The Annals of pharmacotherapy·2026
Same journal

A Comparison of Phenobarbital Dosing Strategies for the Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome.

The Annals of pharmacotherapy·2026
See all related articles

State pharmacy laws have evolved since 1987, with many now defining progressive practice functions. Adopting the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy Model Act offers a uniform purpose and reflects contemporary pharmacist liability.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacy Law
  • Health Policy
  • Professional Regulation

Background:

  • Pharmacy practice acts define the scope of professional responsibilities.
  • Since 1987, there has been a need to re-evaluate and update these statutes.
  • The National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP) proposed a Model State Pharmacy Practice Act in 1992.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the status of state pharmacy practice acts since 1987.
  • To assess the adoption of the 1992 NABP Model State Pharmacy Practice Act.
  • To analyze the statutory definition of the

Main Methods:

  • Review of state pharmacy practice acts for all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
  • Analysis of case law to demonstrate pharmacist liability under existing statutes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Focus on the statutory definition of the "practice of pharmacy" within each act.

    • Main Results:

    • 24% of state pharmacy laws lack a definition for the practice of pharmacy.
    • Key codified activities include compounding (92%), dispensing (100%), consultation (85%), and drug utilization review (69%).
    • Significant recent codifications involve consultation, drug administration, pharmacokinetic consultation, and patient assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • States have increasingly enacted statutes for advanced pharmacy practice functions since 1987.
    • Adopting the NABP Model Act would create a uniform professional purpose and legal framework.
    • This adoption would align legal responsibilities with contemporary practice and allow for future scope expansion.