Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pain assessment with interactive computer animation

Michael Swanston1, Charles Abraham, William A Macrae

  • 1Department of Business Studies, Dundee Institute of Technology, Dundee DD1 1HG UK Centre for Nursing Studies, Dundee Institute of Technology, Dundee DD1 1HG UK Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY UK The Pain Clinic, Dundee Royal Infirmary, Dundee DD1 9ND UK Department of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN UK.

Pain
|June 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects and costs of a group-based educational intervention to reduce opioid use in people with chronic pain: I-WOTCH RCT.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

A Scoping Review of Australian Hospitals' Policies on the Deactivation of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.

Heart, lung & circulation·2026
Same author

Non-Invasive Ventilation Therapy Implementation in Medical Wards-A Scoping Review to Understand Hospitals' Protocols and Procedures.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Digital Health Interventions Providing Behavioral Assessment and Goal Prioritization Support: Scoping Review.

Journal of medical Internet research·2025
Same author

Endurance Sporting Events.

Emergency medicine clinics of North America·2024
Same author

Clinical effectiveness of an online supervised group physical and mental health rehabilitation programme for adults with post-covid-19 condition (REGAIN study): multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2024
Same journal

Efficacy and effectiveness of melatonin for the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo and active controlled trials.

Pain·2026
Same journal

Predictive socio-cultural factors of pain intensity, disability, and quality of life in patients with nonspecific musculoskeletal pain: a prospective cohort study.

Pain·2026
Same journal

Reward-induced endogenous pain inhibition scales with action-outcome certainty in humans.

Pain·2026
Same journal

Training alpha to treat pain: dissociable pathways to analgesia.

Pain·2026
Same journal

Neurophysiological and psychophysical mechanisms associated with immersive virtual reality-induced hypoalgesia: a systematic review.

Pain·2026
Same journal

Dissociable peripheral and central mechanisms of monoacylglycerol lipase inhibition on pain- and depression-related behaviors in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

Pain·2026
See all related articles

Interactive computer animations offer a novel, preferred method for pain assessment, providing reliable quantitative data on pain quality validated against traditional tools.

Area of Science:

  • Pain research
  • Medical informatics
  • Human-computer interaction

Background:

  • Traditional pain assessment often relies on subjective verbal reports.
  • Existing quantitative methods may lack nuanced qualitative data.
  • Visual analogue scales (VAS) are common but can be limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a novel method for pain assessment using interactive computer animation.
  • To compare the validity and reliability of animated pain assessment with the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ).
  • To explore patient preference for animated versus traditional pain assessment methods.

Main Methods:

  • Development of interactive computer animations to capture qualitative aspects of pain experience.
  • Clinical comparison of the animated assessment tool with the SF-MPQ.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Correlation analysis between animated VAS and paper-based VAS.
  • Analysis of patient choices in selecting pain quality animations.

    • Main Results:

    • Animated pain measurements showed reliable comparability with traditional paper-based reporting (VAS correlations).
    • Animated pain quality assessments demonstrated significant correlation with SF-MPQ measures, indicating good concurrent validity.
    • Patients overwhelmingly preferred the interactive animation method over paper-based assessments.
    • A potential link between animation selection patterns and patient verbal fluency was observed.

    Conclusions:

    • Interactive computer animations provide a valid and reliable method for quantitative pain assessment, capturing qualitative pain aspects effectively.
    • This animation-based approach is a preferred alternative for patients compared to traditional methods.
    • The findings support the use of interactive animations in pain research and clinical practice for improved patient experience and data collection.