Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mammographic positioning: evaluation from the view box

L W Bassett1, I A Hirbawi, N DeBruhl

  • 1Iris Cantor Center for Breast Imaging, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center 90024-6952.

Radiology
|September 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Employment after a breast cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of ethnically diverse urban women.

Journal of community health·2011
Same author

Breast sonography.

Breast disease·2005
Same author

Determination of size in invasive breast carcinoma: pathologic considerations and clinical implications.

American journal of clinical pathology·2002
Same author

Mammographic findings of diffuse amyloidosis and carcinoma of the breast.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
Same author

Breast imaging: mammography and ultrasonography.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2001
Same author

Volume-localized two-dimensional correlated magnetic resonance spectroscopy of human breast cancer.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2001
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

This study assessed mammogram positioning quality using six criteria. Improved positioning was observed in 68% of examinations, highlighting the utility of these criteria for quality control in mammography.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Mammography is a crucial tool for breast cancer screening.
  • Consistent and accurate breast positioning is essential for diagnostic quality.
  • Evaluating positioning performance is key to improving mammographic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish and evaluate objective criteria for assessing breast positioning quality in mammography.
  • To determine the effectiveness of these criteria in identifying suboptimal mammographic views.
  • To provide a framework for quality control in mammographic examinations.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 1,000 bilateral screening mammographic examinations.
  • Evaluation of six positioning criteria, including tissue depth, pectoral muscle extent, and nipple profile.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of new mammograms with previous examinations to assess improvement.

    • Main Results:

    • Pectoral muscle depicted within 1 cm of the nipple line or below on 81% of MLO views.
    • Adequate fibroglandular tissue depicted on 77% of MLO views.
    • Nipple in profile on 88% of MLO and 89% of CC views.
    • Overall positioning improvement noted in 68% of examinations upon comparison.

    Conclusions:

    • The defined criteria effectively evaluate breast positioning quality in mammography.
    • These criteria can be implemented for routine quality control and performance assessment.
    • Improved positioning enhances the diagnostic yield of screening mammograms.