Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Another means for measuring the motion aftereffect

R Blake1, E Hiris

  • 1Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240.

Vision Research
|July 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is there a difference in pressures and forces under the roller with different pads when lunging horses with the Pessoa training aid?

Journal of equine veterinary science·2026
Same author

Use of a spot-check protocol to measure ventricular response rate in dogs with atrial fibrillation.

Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2025
Same author

Use of the subcostal view for obtaining aortic spectral Doppler-derived outflow velocities in cats.

Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2025
Same author

Tight nosebands apply high pressures on the horses' face and alter stride kinematics.

Journal of equine veterinary science·2025
Same author

Sustained perceptual invisibility of solid shapes following contour adaptation to partial outlines.

Consciousness and cognition·2014
Same author

Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations.

Journal of vision·2009
Same journal

Impact of crowding on visual appearance and performance in amblyopia.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Editorial for VSI Amblyopia: Advances in Amblyopia Research.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Researchers developed a new method to measure the motion aftereffect (MAE). This technique quantifies the directional bias perceived after adapting to specific motion, offering insights into visual perception.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Neuroscience
  • Perception Psychology
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • The motion aftereffect (MAE) is a perceptual illusion where continued exposure to a specific motion direction leads to a subsequent perception of motion in the opposite direction.
  • Conventional methods for measuring MAE exist, but a novel, dynamic procedure offers new avenues for research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate a new procedure for quantifying the motion aftereffect (MAE).
  • To demonstrate that this dynamic MAE procedure exhibits characteristics similar to conventional MAE measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Adaptation to an animation sequence with dots moving in a specific direction.
  • Presentation of a test sequence with dots moving in all directions to assess perceived directional bias.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Nullification of the MAE by introducing a counteracting motion percentage.
  • Utilizing the method of constant stimuli to determine the percentage yielding incoherent motion.

    • Main Results:

    • The new procedure successfully induced an MAE, with the test sequence appearing to move opposite to the adapted direction.
    • Varying the percentage of counteracting dots allowed for precise measurement of the MAE.
    • The dynamic MAE measured using this procedure showed characteristics consistent with the conventional MAE.

    Conclusions:

    • A novel and effective dynamic procedure for measuring the motion aftereffect (MAE) has been established.
    • This method provides a quantifiable approach to studying visual motion perception and aftereffects.
    • The findings support the robustness of MAE phenomena across different measurement techniques.