Related Experiment Videos
[Changes in hemostasis in ischemic heart disease]
Insights
Blood coagulation changes were studied in patients with ischemic heart disease. Thrombolytic therapy showed improved hemostasis compared to classical treatment, suggesting its benefit in myocardial infarction (MI).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hematology
- Internal Medicine
Abstract:
The relationship between changes in blood coagulation, the occurrence and severity of risk factors of ischemic heart disease and the clinical condition of the patient was investigated. The at risk group of patients 42.2% had more than 3 pathological parameters. Intravascular blood coagulation was not activated in any of the patients. In patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), 62.2% had more than 3 pathological parameters on the first day of MI development. Demonstrable activation of intravascular blood coagulation was found in 28.2% of these patients. On day 5 of MI, activation of intravascular blood coagulation was recorded in 57.7% of the patients treated by classical approach and in 15.4-30.8% of the patients on thrombolytic treatment. In the at risk group, primary hemostasis and the fibrinolytic system were more affected, in patients with MI the whole hemostatic mechanism was involved. On day 5 of MI, in patients with classical therapy pathological laboratory findings still persisted or were even more deteriorated, particularly increases in fibrinogen level. At that time, in patients on thrombolytic therapy no substantial changes of initial values were recorded. No correlation was found to exist between changes in hemostasis and the risk profile or between changes in hemostasis and the clinical severity of MI. The obtained results justify the administration of antithrombotic substances, especially in patients with unstable angina pectoris. On observing time constraints, administration of thrombolytics is justified in MI. (Fig. 9, Ref. 25.)