Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Peer review and professional ethics

F W Sullivan

    The American Journal of Psychiatry
    |February 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary

    The public needs better information about medical peer review processes. Guidelines are offered for physicians and ethics should be integrated into quality and cost reviews.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A state catastrophic health insurance plan and the peer review process.

    Hospital & community psychiatry·1977
    Same author

    Peer review and PSRO in American psychiatry.

    The Psychiatric quarterly·1977
    Same author

    Peer review and PSRO: an update.

    The American journal of psychiatry·1976
    Same author

    Senator Bennett: where are you? Any success of P.S.R.O. will be credited to him, any failure to organized medicine.

    R.I. medical journal·1975
    Same author

    Professional standards review organizations: the current scene.

    The American journal of psychiatry·1974
    Same author

    Relationship of clinical symptomatology to abnormal EEG findings: a family study.

    The American journal of psychiatry·1967

    Area of Science:

    • Medical quality assurance
    • Healthcare ethics
    • Professional self-regulation

    Background:

    • The medical profession, fiscal intermediaries, and government agencies have inadequately informed the public about peer review.
    • There is a need for clearer understanding of the nature and scope of peer review in healthcare.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide guidelines for physicians and peer review committees.
    • To advocate for the integration of professional ethics into medical service reviews.

    Main Methods:

    • The study outlines recommendations based on the author's analysis of current peer review practices.
    • It suggests a framework for enhancing the peer review process.

    Main Results:

    • Guidelines for effective physician and committee participation in peer review are presented.
    • The importance of incorporating professional ethics into the evaluation of medical services is highlighted.

    Conclusions:

    • Improved public information regarding peer review is essential.
    • Integrating ethical considerations into the review of medical quality, cost, quantity, and availability will strengthen healthcare oversight.

    Related Experiment Videos