Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mechanisms mediating visual detection in static perimetry

R S Harwerth1, E L Smith, L DeSantis

  • 1College of Optometry, University of Houston, Texas 77204-6052.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|September 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A 5.8-kDa component of manuka honey stimulates immune cells via TLR4.

Journal of leukocyte biology·2007
Same author

Development of temporal response properties and contrast sensitivity of V1 and V2 neurons in macaque monkeys.

Journal of neurophysiology·2007
Same author

Method for assessing the chronic toxicity of marine and estuarine sediment-associated contaminants using the amphipod Corophium volutator.

Marine environmental research·2007
Same author

Effects of perceptual learning on local stereopsis and neuronal responses of V1 and V2 in prism-reared monkeys.

Journal of neurophysiology·2007
Same author

Cortical effects of brief daily periods of unrestricted vision during early monocular form deprivation.

Journal of neurophysiology·2006
Same author

Osteocyte apoptosis and osteoclast presence in chicken radii 0-4 days following osteotomy.

Calcified tissue international·2005

This study reveals that test stimulus size and wavelength in perimetry can selectively activate different visual processing channels. By adjusting these parameters, clinicians can bias detection toward specific nonopponent or opponent mechanisms for more targeted visual field testing.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Visual Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Static perimetry typically uses broadband white-light stimuli, obscuring the specific visual detection mechanisms involved.
  • Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for accurate perimetry, as different neural pathways may be engaged.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the relative sensitivities of nonopponent and opponent visual detection mechanisms under standard perimetry conditions.
  • To investigate how stimulus parameters influence the engagement of these visual pathways.

Main Methods:

  • Psychophysical measurements of spectral sensitivity were conducted on rhesus monkey subjects using the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
  • A three-channel model analyzing short-wavelength-sensitive, nonopponent (luminance), and opponent (chromatic) mechanisms was employed.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Visual detection mechanisms varied with test field size and wavelength.
  • A short-wavelength-sensitive mechanism was evident but decreased with eccentricity for standard stimuli (Goldmann Size III).
  • Larger stimuli (Size V) enhanced opponent mechanisms, while smaller stimuli (Size II) favored nonopponent mechanisms.

Conclusions:

  • Perimetry detection thresholds can be selectively biased toward different visual processing channels.
  • Appropriate selection of test stimulus size and wavelength allows for targeted activation of photopic visual processing channels.