Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Data comparability issues in international research and quality assurance
J L Dreachslin1, M Zernott, S Mendenhall
1Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities, Ann Arbor, MI 48105.
Abstract:
Impediments to and progress toward valid and reliable international quality comparisons at the diagnosis or case type level are identified and discussed. The need for uniformity in each of the following is established: (1) international clinical data set, (2) definitions of clinical data elements and (3) data collection practices. The need to establish a clinically adequate international data base is discussed and action steps are identified.
More Related Videos
04:50Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
Published on: August 4, 2023
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation