Related Experiment Videos
Physician assisted death and hard choices
1University of Minnesota, Duluth 55812.
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|June 1, 1993
Summary
Physician-assisted death laws may highlight healthcare inequities, but do not create new moral reasons to fix them. Addressing these inequities via a right to healthcare is also unfeasible due to resource scarcity.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Health Policy
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- Healthcare inequities can influence patient decisions regarding end-of-life care.
- The passage of physician-assisted death (PAD) legislation brings ethical considerations surrounding patient autonomy and societal obligations to the forefront.
- Existing disparities in healthcare access may become underlying factors in choices made under PAD laws.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze whether inequities in healthcare access, when becoming motives for choosing assisted death, create a compelling moral reason for their elimination.
- To examine the ethical implications of healthcare system failures as drivers for physician-assisted death.
- To assess the feasibility of addressing these inequities through the establishment of a universal right to healthcare.
Main Methods:
- Philosophical argumentation and ethical analysis.
- Review of existing literature on healthcare ethics, end-of-life care, and health policy.
- Conceptual analysis of moral obligations and resource allocation in healthcare.
Main Results:
- The study argues that the passage of an assisted death law does not generate additional moral imperatives to rectify healthcare inequities, even if these inequities become reasons for choosing assisted death.
- It posits that healthcare disparities do not inherently gain moral weight for elimination simply because they influence end-of-life decisions.
- The research concludes that establishing a right to healthcare to eliminate these motives is not feasible due to inherent scarcity of medical resources.
Conclusions:
- Healthcare inequities should be addressed on their own moral merits, independent of their role as motivators for physician-assisted death.
- The ethical justification for eliminating healthcare disparities does not stem from their influence on assisted death choices.
- Resource limitations present a significant barrier to implementing a right to healthcare as a solution for such inequities.