Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing and improving quality in the post anesthesia care unit

D F Levin1

  • 1Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

The Nursing Clinics of North America
|September 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HIV/AIDS and nutrition. Implications for disease management.

Nursing case management : managing the process of patient care·2000
Same author

Leadership and vision.

Emphasis, nursing·1993
Same author

Geriatric ambulatory surgery patients. Assessing cognitive functions.

AORN journal·1988
See all related articles

The Joint Commission

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Clinical Process Monitoring

Background:

  • Healthcare organizations face complex interdisciplinary challenges.
  • Effective quality assessment and improvement are crucial for patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present the 10-step methodology by The Joint Commission for quality assessment.
  • To illustrate its application in a post anesthesia care unit (PACU) setting.
  • To discuss quality improvement tools like flow charts and cause-and-effect diagrams.

Main Methods:

  • Detailed explanation of each of the 10 steps.
  • Application of the methodology to a PACU monitoring and evaluation process.
  • Discussion of flow charts and cause-and-effect diagrams as quality tools.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The 10-step methodology provides a rigorous, objective, systematic, and relevant framework.
  • The described PACU process demonstrates a structured approach to quality improvement.
  • Flow charts and cause-and-effect diagrams are valuable for process analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The Joint Commission's 10-step methodology is effective for complex healthcare quality issues.
  • Systematic monitoring and evaluation in PACU settings enhance patient care.
  • Utilizing specific quality tools aids in problem-solving and process improvement.