Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Regression analysis of grouped survival data: informative censoring and double sampling
S G Baker1, Y Wax, B H Patterson
1National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Abstract:
To analyze grouped survival data subject to informative censoring, we propose the following two-part model: a logistic regression model for the hazard for failure, given covariates and a logistic regression model for the hazard for informative censoring, given time of failure and covariates. We fit the model to survival data arising from a double sampling design: In a full follow-up (FF) sample subjects are followed after censoring, and in a partial follow-up (PF) sample subjects are not followed after censoring. We illustrate the methodology using data from a study of wound infection in which patients in the PF sample are censored by release from the hospital, whereas patients in the FF sample are followed after hospital release. We discuss identifiability when there is only a PF sample. We also consider how the allocation between the PF and FF samples affects the precision of estimates.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time until a...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are observed.
Censoring Survival Data

