[Identification of viable myocardium by 201Tl scintigraphy: a comparison of methods]

The present study was undertaken to compare four different imaging approaches to evaluate uptake defect reversibility. 24 infarcted patients underwent standard stress/redistribution 201Tl imaging (R1). Then, after reinjection of 37 MBq of 201Tl, patients were re-imaged either after 15 min (R2) 24 h later (R3). A separate rest study (R4) following a new tracer injection was done within 2-3 days. Planar images were obtained in the standard three views and subdivided into 216 segments for qualitative analysis based on a visual score. A semiquantitative analysis based upon circumferential profiles was also applied. A stress defect was found in 127 segments (58.7%). By visual inspection reperfusion was considered to occur in 32.3%, 41.7%, 33.0% and 49.6% of the cases with R1, R2, R3, and R4, respectively. The semiquantitative method showed a high reperfusion only with R1 (62%), while the other procedures proved less effective. No improvement was found with R4. Six patients (25%) showed myocardial viability that was not detected with the early reinjection technique.