Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Survival analysis of joint replacements

D W Murray1, A J Carr, C Bulstrode

  • 1Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume
|September 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Survival analysis for joint replacements faces challenges with low failure rates. This review of 35 studies identifies problems and suggests solutions for accurate total joint replacement analysis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Knee arthroplasty compared with joint distraction for osteoarthritis: a phase III randomized controlled trial.

Bone & joint open·2025
Same author

The outcomes of acute periprosthetic joint infection following unicompartmental knee replacement managed with early debridement, Antibiotics, and implant retention.

The Knee·2024
Same author

No exponential rise in revision knee replacement surgery over the past 15 years: an analysis from the National Joint Registry.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2022
Same author

Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement using radiostereometric analysis.

The Knee·2021
Same author

Age stratified, matched comparison of unicompartmental and total knee replacement.

The Knee·2020
Same author

Peri-operative administration of tranexamic acid in lower limb arthroplasty: a multicentre, prospective cohort study.

Anaesthesia·2020

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Engineering

Background:

  • Survival analysis is commonly used for total joint replacement (TJR) outcomes.
  • Low failure rates in TJR can significantly challenge the accuracy of survival analysis.
  • Existing literature lacks comprehensive assessments of these specific challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of low failure rates on survival analyses in TJR.
  • To identify and categorize the drawbacks encountered in recent TJR survival studies.
  • To propose recommendations for improving the methodology of TJR survival analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of 35 recent survival analyses of joint replacements.
  • Qualitative assessment of methodological limitations related to low event rates.
  • Synthesis of findings to identify common problems and effective strategies.

Main Results:

  • Low failure rates in TJR studies lead to statistical power issues and biased estimates.
  • Common problems include wide confidence intervals and difficulties in comparing implant survivability.
  • Specific analytical techniques are often inadequate for very low event scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • Standard survival analysis methods require careful consideration and potential adaptation for TJR with low failure rates.
  • Methodological improvements are crucial for reliable interpretation of TJR outcomes.
  • Recommendations focus on alternative statistical approaches and transparent reporting to mitigate drawbacks.

Related Experiment Videos