Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do liquid crystal displays assure better readability than cathode-ray tubes?

S Ishihara1, M Miyao, M Kashiwamata

  • 1Department of Public Health, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Japan.

Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. Japanese Journal of Hygiene
|August 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Liquid crystal displays (LCDs) may not always offer better readability than cathode-ray tubes (CRTs). Middle-aged workers experienced significantly reduced reading performance on non-backlit LCDs, highlighting display and lighting needs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Endometrial epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by menstruation-related inflammatory factors during hypoxia.

Molecular human reproduction·2021
Same author

Effects of age at estrogen replacement therapy initiation on trabecular bone score in Japanese adults with Turner syndrome.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2020
Same author

Slow movement resistance training using body weight improves muscle mass in the elderly: A randomized controlled trial.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2017
Same author

Steroid cell tumour, not otherwise specified: Rare case with primary amenorrhoea in a 16-year-old.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2015
Same author

Evidence of a sophisticatedly heterogeneous population of human umbilical vein endothelial cells.

Transplantation proceedings·2014
Same author

Mechanical Properties of a Single-Headed Processive Motor, Inner-Arm Dynein Subspecies-c of ChlamydomonasStudied at the Single Molecule Level.

Journal of biological physics·2013

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Display Technology
  • Ergonomics

Background:

  • Flat-panel displays, particularly liquid crystal displays (LCDs), are prevalent for information display.
  • The comparative readability of LCDs versus traditional cathode-ray tubes (CRTs) remains a subject of investigation.
  • Understanding display performance across different age groups and lighting conditions is crucial for user comfort and efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the readability of LCDs and CRTs under various lighting conditions.
  • To assess the impact of backlighting on LCD readability.
  • To investigate age-related differences in display readability, focusing on middle-aged workers.

Main Methods:

  • An experiment was conducted with fifteen healthy workers across three age groups (young males, young females, middle-aged workers).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants performed a syllable-checking task using Japanese katakana on four display types: negative CRT, positive CRT, backlit LCD, and non-backlit LCD.
  • Testing occurred under four ambient light levels, including conditions with and without reflected glare.

    • Main Results:

    • Multiple regression analysis revealed that non-backlit LCDs significantly impaired reading performance in middle-aged subjects.
    • Younger participants generally performed better than middle-aged participants across display types and lighting conditions.
    • The presence of reflected glare at 500 lx also negatively impacted performance, particularly for non-backlit LCDs.

    Conclusions:

    • Non-backlit LCDs present significant readability challenges for middle-aged workers compared to CRTs and backlit LCDs.
    • Middle-aged workers require more suitable display technologies and comfortable lighting environments to optimize their reading performance.
    • Future display design and workplace lighting strategies should consider age-specific ergonomic needs for enhanced readability.