Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Blood on the shroud of turin.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Donepezil for Down's syndrome.

The American journal of psychiatry·2001
Same author

Pediatric human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: an overview.

Seminars in speech and language·2000
Same author

Language development and assessment in children with human immunodeficiency virus: 3 to 6 years.

Seminars in speech and language·2000
Same author

The child health supervision visit as an opportunity to address parenting issues during infancy.

Pediatric annals·1998
Same author

Preschool development. Part 2: Psychosocial/behavioral development.

Pediatrics in review·1997

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 22, 2026

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

The Fluharty Preschool Speech and Language Screening Test: a population-based validation study using

R A Sturner1, J H Heller, S G Funk

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
|August 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

The Fluharty Preschool Speech and Language Screening Test shows low sensitivity for identifying language disorders in preschoolers. It may be more effective for screening children with articulation impairments.

More Related Videos

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 22, 2026

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Speech-Language Pathology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Pediatric Audiology

Background:

  • Accurate screening tools are crucial for early identification of speech and language disorders in preschool children.
  • The Fluharty Preschool Speech and Language Screening Test is a widely used tool for this purpose.
  • Validation studies are essential to determine the clinical utility of screening instruments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clinically validate the Fluharty Preschool Speech and Language Screening Test.
  • To assess the test's sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for identifying speech and language impairments in 4- and 5-year-old children.
  • To compare the screening performance for language disorders versus articulation impairments.

Main Methods:

  • Two cohorts of 700 preschool children (4- and 5-year-olds) were screened using the Fluharty test.
  • Stratified samples from each cohort underwent criterion testing for articulation and language.
  • Clinical validation indices including sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value were calculated.

Main Results:

  • The Fluharty test demonstrated low sensitivity for language outcomes (0.43 and 0.31) but higher sensitivity for articulation impairments.
  • Specificity was high (0.82 and 0.93), indicating good ability to correctly identify children without disorders.
  • Overreferral rates were 14% and 5%, with underreferral at 14% for both cohorts.

Conclusions:

  • The Fluharty Preschool Speech and Language Screening Test is not sensitive enough for reliable screening of language disorders in preschoolers.
  • The test shows potential for identifying children with articulation impairments.
  • Further research may be needed to refine screening protocols or explore alternative measures for language disorders.