[Digital subtraction angiocardiography: reliability of densitometric determination of left ventricular volume and...

The angiographic assessment of left ventricular volume (LV) and ejection fraction (EF) by means of the area-length method (ALM) is based upon geometric assumptions, which might lead to erroneous results. With the development of digital subtraction angiocardiography in real-time, densitometric procedures of calculating left ventricular parameters can be used on-line. This study examines both reliability and accuracy of a densitometric technique for evaluating LV and EF in comparison to the single-plane ALM. Contrast images of heart casts and left ventricular angiograms of 54 patients suffering from different cardiac diseases were obtained by the image acquisition and processing system Polytron 1000 VR (Siemens AG, Erlangen, FRG). Digital images of both heart casts and patients were evaluated densitometrically and geometrically by two independent observers. In the phantom study the densitometric method exhibited a significantly (p < 0.01) better agreement with the true values than the ALM. The evaluation of left ventricular angiograms in patients comparing densitometry with the ALM demonstrated a relatively high residual deviation (enddiastolic volume Syx = +/- 27 ml, endsystolic volume Syx = +/- 19.4 ml). This is mainly due to systematic, method-related errors of densitometry and the morphometric technique. The intra- and interobserver variability in calculating EF showed a significantly (p < 0.05) smaller residual deviation for densitometry than for ALM; no significant differences were found for the calculation of LV. In conclusion, we demonstrated that the presented densitometric technique offers an objective and simple means of determining LV and EF with comparable reliability and validity to the area-length method.