Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Tracking Drug-induced Changes in Receptor Post-internalization Trafficking by Colocalizational Analysis
Published on: July 3, 2015
Modulation of Mu1 opioid binding by magnesium: evidence for multiple receptor conformations
K M Standifer1, J A Clark, G W Pasternak
1Cotzias Laboratory of Neuro-Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center New York, New York.
Abstract:
Previous studies have revealed that MgSO4 markedly increases mu1 binding and is associated with approximately a 10-fold slower dissociation rate, implying an increase in receptor affinity. Yet, saturation studies showed only a slight change in Kd values with a significant increase in the Bmax values. We now extend these observations using detailed kinetic approaches to better understand the role of MgSO4 on mu1 binding. Using blocking concentrations of the delta-selective ligand DPDPE, low concentrations of [3H]DADLE label mu1 sites almost exclusively in calf thalamic homogenates in the presence of either MgSO4 or EDTA, as demonstrated in competition studies. Saturation studies performed under equilibrium conditions with EDTA or MgSO4 reveal Bmax values of 1.89 +/- 0.20 and 4.4 +/- 0.19 fmol/mg wet weight tissue, respectively, with Kd values of 3.8 +/- 0.8 and 1.92 +/- 0.27 nM. Despite the small but significant 2-fold difference in Kd values under equilibrium conditions, kinetic studies reveal the dissociation rate constants (k-1) for the two assay conditions vary by almost 8-fold. NaCl increases the dissociation rate far more in assays performed in EDTA, while binding in the presence of MgSO4 is more sensitive to the stabilized GTP analog 5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate. Association studies also reveal a 20-fold difference between rate constants (k+1). The apparent association rate constants (kobs) in the presence of EDTA are concentration-dependent, whereas varying the concentration of [3H]DADLE has no effect on the rate constants under MgSO4 conditions. Our data suggest a model in which mu1 binding comprises two sequential steps and at least three distinct receptor binding states.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
More Related Videos
07:16Methods for the Discovery of Novel Compounds Modulating a Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Receptor Type A Neurotransmission
Published on: August 16, 2018
16:02Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
Published on: February 10, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Calmodulin-dependent Signaling
The Ca2+-CaM complex does not have enzymatic activity by itself. Instead, the complex binds downstream target proteins, including membrane proteins or enzymes,...
Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptor: Gating Mechanism
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with one...
Cholinergic Receptors: Muscarinic
The subtypes M1, M3, and M5 couple with the Gq subunit and activate the phospholipase C (PLC) activity, mobilizing intracellular Ca2+. Activation...
Analgesia and Pain Management