Related Experiment Videos
Negative regulation of mitogen-stimulated, anchorage-independent cell growth by a tumor-suppressor gene function
1Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Abstract:
Immortal, nontumorigenic cell lines of Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells with different tumor-suppressing activity were isolated. Subclones from the parental cells were isolated that either had retained (supB+) or lost (supB-) the ability to suppress tumorigenicity after hybridization with tumor cells. The growth properties of these cells were studied to determine how this tumor-suppressor gene function influences cell growth. When the cells were grown on plastic, their growth properties were similar, and neither cell type grew in soft agar containing 10% serum, which supported the growth of tumorigenic cells. However, in agar supplemented with growth factors and 10% serum, supB- cells formed colonies whereas supB+ cells did not. Efficient growth (colony-forming efficiencies greater than 20%) of supB- cells was obtained in agar supplemented with serum and a combination of epidermal growth factor (EGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and insulin (EPI) or with serum and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). The effect of EPI and bFGF together was additive. supB+ cells failed to grow under any of these conditions, suggesting that the suppressor gene function blocked the growth response of the cells to multiple growth factors when the cells were suspended in agar. In SupB- cells, transforming growth factor-beta 1 and retinoic acid inhibited anchorage-independent growth response to EPI but not the growth response to bFGF. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that bFGF stimulates the growth of supB- cells by a signal transduction pathway that differs from the pathway stimulated by EGF or PDGF. Thus, this suppressor gene function may regulate anchorage-independent growth at some common point in signal transduction for multiple mitogens.
Insights
Tumor suppressor gene function in Syrian hamster embryo cells blocks anchorage-independent growth. This suppression affects responses to multiple growth factors, suggesting a role in regulating cell signaling pathways.
Area of Science:
- Cell Biology
- Cancer Research
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Tumorigenicity is often suppressed by specific genes.
- Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells provide a model for studying tumor suppression.
- Understanding how suppressor genes regulate cell growth is crucial for cancer research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of tumor-suppressor gene function on cell growth properties.
- To determine how the loss or retention of tumor-suppressor activity affects anchorage-independent growth.
- To elucidate the role of specific growth factors in mediating the effects of tumor suppressor genes.
Main Methods:
- Isolation of SHE cell subclones with differing tumor-suppressing activity (supB+ and supB-).
- Culturing cells on plastic and in soft agar under various growth factor conditions.
- Assessing colony-forming efficiencies in soft agar to measure anchorage-independent growth.
- Investigating the effects of growth factors like EGF, PDGF, insulin, and bFGF.
Main Results:
- supB- cells, lacking tumor-suppressor activity, grew in soft agar with specific growth factors (EGF, PDGF, insulin, bFGF), while supB+ cells did not.
- Growth factor combinations (EPI or bFGF) were efficient in promoting supB- cell growth in agar.
- Transforming growth factor-beta 1 and retinoic acid differentially inhibited growth responses to EPI but not bFGF in supB- cells.
- The suppressor gene function appears to block responses to multiple growth factors in anchorage-independent conditions.
Conclusions:
- Tumor-suppressor gene function in SHE cells regulates anchorage-independent growth.
- The suppressor gene likely acts at a common point in signal transduction pathways for multiple mitogens.
- Distinct signaling pathways may be involved in growth stimulation by bFGF compared to EGF/PDGF.