Related Experiment Videos
Hepatitis B prevalence in local authority employees
G Kudesia1, D Briggs, M Donaldson
1Public Health Laboratory, Sheffield, UK.
Occupational Medicine (Oxford, England)
|August 1, 1993
Summary
Hepatitis B infection prevalence was 1.2% in local authority employees. Four of five positive individuals worked with vulnerable populations, suggesting potential occupational health risks.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Occupational Health
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
Background:
- Hepatitis B virus (HBV) poses a significant public health concern.
- Understanding HBV prevalence in occupational settings is crucial for targeted prevention strategies.
- Employees in local authorities may have unique exposure risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of hepatitis B infection among employees in local authorities.
- To identify potential occupational risk factors associated with hepatitis B infection.
- To compare HBV prevalence in this cohort to a general population control group.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study involving 420 employees from three local authorities.
- Serological testing for hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs).
- Comparison with a control group of blood donors.
Main Results:
- Overall prevalence of hepatitis B infection (indicated by anti-HBc) was 1.2% (5 out of 420 employees).
- Among positive cases, one was an HBsAg carrier, three had anti-HBs, and one had only anti-HBc.
- No significant difference in prevalence was found compared to blood donors (P > 0.05).
- A notable finding was that four of the five anti-HBc positive individuals worked with mentally or physically handicapped individuals or those recently discharged from long-term care.
Conclusions:
- The prevalence of hepatitis B infection in this cohort of local authority employees is relatively low and not significantly different from the general population.
- However, a higher proportion of positive cases were identified among employees working with vulnerable populations, highlighting a potential occupational health concern.
- Further investigation into targeted screening and preventative measures for healthcare workers and those in close contact with at-risk individuals is warranted.