Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

"Whistleblowing": a health issue

K J Lennane

    BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
    |September 11, 1993
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Whistleblowing is vital for societal protection, yet organizations often retaliate, causing severe, lasting health, financial, and personal harm to whistleblowers and their families.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The downside of whistleblowing.

    The Medical journal of Australia·1998
    Same author

    Management of moderate to severe alcohol-related brain damage (Korsakoff's syndrome).

    The Medical journal of Australia·1986
    Same author

    Treatment of benzodiazepine dependence.

    The Medical journal of Australia·1986
    Same author

    Doctors and alcohol.

    The Medical journal of Australia·1985
    Same author

    Social and medical attitudes toward dysmenorrhea.

    The Journal of reproductive medicine·1980
    Same author

    Pain and pain relief in labour.

    The New Zealand medical journal·1978

    Area of Science:

    • Organizational behavior
    • Public health
    • Social science

    Background:

    • Whistleblowing serves as a critical mechanism for exposing organizational misconduct and safeguarding public interest.
    • Despite its importance, whistleblowers frequently face significant repercussions from their employers.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the typical organizational responses to whistleblowing incidents.
    • To assess the multifaceted effects of whistleblowing on the individuals who report wrongdoing.

    Main Methods:

    • A questionnaire survey was administered to whistleblowers who had contacted Whistleblowers Australia.
    • The study included 35 participants (25 men, 10 women) from diverse occupations with prior whistleblowing experiences.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • All surveyed whistleblowers experienced adverse consequences, with victimization often beginning immediately after internal complaints.
    • Common repercussions included job dismissal, demotion, forced resignation, and significant income reduction.
    • Whistleblowers and their families endured severe health issues, financial losses, and relationship breakdowns, with limited support from authorities or colleagues.

    Conclusions:

    • Organizational retaliation against whistleblowers leads to profound and enduring negative health, financial, and personal outcomes.
    • The study underscores the urgent need for improved support systems and protections for whistleblowers.