Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Surgical evaluation at the crossroads

A V Pollock1

  • 1Scarborough Hospital, North Yorkshire, UK.

The British Journal of Surgery
|August 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Surgeons can improve practice by objectively comparing new treatments to traditional ones. Analyzing past surgical outcomes provides valuable data, even without randomized controlled trials.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Radiology of acute pancreatitis.

The Journal of the Faculty of Radiologists. Faculty of Radiologists (Great Britain)·2014
Same author

Moulds producing penicillin-like antibiotics.

Nature·2010
Same author

Production of citrinin by five species of Penicillium.

Nature·2010
Same author

Guidelines for the correct conduct of clinical research in surgery.

The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica·1998
Same author

Ten years of improvement in the standard of randomised controlled clinical trials in four international journals.

Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae·1997
Same author

How do we measure surgical competence?

The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica·1996

Area of Science:

  • Surgical research methodology
  • Evidence-based surgery

Background:

  • Physicians and oncologists have widely adopted randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
  • Surgeons have been slower to integrate RCTs into their practice.
  • A recent decline in RCTs published in surgical journals is noted.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the value of comparative outcome analysis in surgery.
  • To suggest methods for improving surgical practice through objective comparisons.
  • To address the decline in surgical randomized controlled trials.

Main Methods:

  • The paper suggests a retrospective or comparative analysis of surgical outcomes.
  • It emphasizes the importance of complete, accurate, and objective data.
  • Comparison can be made against historical data or other surgical groups.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Objective comparisons of novel versus traditional interventions can yield valuable insights.
  • This approach can inform and improve surgical decision-making and practice.
  • Patient reluctance to be randomized may contribute to the decline in surgical RCTs.

Conclusions:

  • Comparative outcome analysis is a viable method for advancing surgical knowledge.
  • Surgeons can enhance practice by rigorously evaluating intervention outcomes.
  • Addressing patient perceptions may be key to increasing participation in surgical trials.