Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparative assessment of cephalometric errors

J M Battagel1

  • 1Department of Child Dental Health, London Hospital Medical College Dental School, England.

European Journal of Orthodontics
|August 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of sleep nasendoscopy on the outcome of mandibular advancement splint therapy in subjects with sleep-related breathing disorders.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2007
Same author

Dental side-effects of mandibular advancement splint wear in patients who snore.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2005
Same author

Sleep nasendoscopy as a predictor of treatment success in snorers using mandibular advancement splints.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2005
Same author

A comparison of the Twin Block and Herbst mandibular advancement splints in the treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a prospective study.

European journal of orthodontics·2005
Same author

Non-apneic snoring and the orthodontist: the effectiveness of mandibular advancement splints.

Journal of orthodontics·2004
Same author

Non-apneic snoring and the orthodontist: radiographic pharyngeal dimension changes with supine posture and mandibular protrusion.

Journal of orthodontics·2004
Same journal

Very long-term (≥ 15 years) prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in adult Herbst patients.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Failure rates of 958 interradicular mini-screws for maxillary total arch distalization following a well-established insertion protocol.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Compensatory characteristics and influencing factors of the sagittal curvature of the maxillary arch based on three-dimensional fusion imaging.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Glass ionomer open exposure and closed exposure of palatally displaced canines: a randomised controlled trial comparing postoperative pain perception and complications.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Shape variability and sexual dimorphism of the chin: a 3D geometric morphometric analysis.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Powered vs. manual toothbrushes in fixed orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
See all related articles

Quantifying measurement error in cephalometric radiography is crucial. This study reviews error sources and compares techniques for assessing accuracy in skeletal, dental, and soft tissue measurements.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics and Dental Imaging
  • Biostatistics in Medical Measurement

Background:

  • Cephalometric radiography is fundamental in orthodontics and craniofacial surgery.
  • Accurate measurements are vital for diagnosis, treatment planning, and outcome assessment.
  • Understanding and quantifying measurement error is essential for reliable clinical interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and outline potential sources of error in cephalometric radiograph measurement.
  • To critically assess commonly applied techniques for quantifying measurement error.
  • To compare the accuracy of various skeletal, dental, and soft tissue measurements using different error assessment methods.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of error assessment in cephalometric measurements.
  • Pooling data from two error studies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of 12 specific cephalometric measurements using three statistical techniques: error of a single recording, confidence limits, and coefficient of reliability.
  • Evaluation of different mathematical criteria within each technique.

    • Main Results:

    • The study identified and reviewed various sources of measurement error in cephalometric radiography.
    • Three common techniques for error assessment were examined, with varying suitability.
    • Comparison of 12 measurements revealed inconsistencies in accuracy depending on the statistical criteria used.
    • One mathematical method proved entirely unsuitable for error estimation.

    Conclusions:

    • The precision of cephalometric radiograph measurement is inherently limited and requires careful error quantification.
    • Different statistical methods yield varying results, highlighting the importance of selecting appropriate techniques.
    • A thorough understanding of statistical methods is necessary for accurate interpretation of measurement error in cephalometry.
    • Recommendations are provided for the most effective approaches to estimating measurement error in this field.