Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predictive head-movements during automobile mirror-sampling

R R Mourant, C G Grimson

    Perceptual and Motor Skills
    |February 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary

    Drivers frequently use predictive eye-head movements, with head movements preceding eye movements, during lane changes and merges. This pattern occurred twice as often as classical eye-first responses, regardless of driver experience.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Visual fatigue and cathode ray tube display terminals.

    Human factors·1981
    Same author

    Vehicle fingertip reach controls--human factors recommendations.

    Applied ergonomics·1981
    Same author

    Luminance specifications for automobile instrument panels.

    Human factors·1976
    Same author

    Strategies of visual search by novice and experimental drivers.

    Human factors·1972
    Same author

    Mapping eye-movement patterns to the visual scene in driving: an exploratory study.

    Human factors·1970

    Area of Science:

    • Human Factors and Ergonomics
    • Automotive Safety
    • Motor Control

    Background:

    • Understanding driver visual sampling behavior is crucial for enhancing vehicle safety systems.
    • Previous research has explored eye movements, but the integrated eye-head response during complex maneuvers requires further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze and compare eye-head response patterns in novice, young experienced, and mature drivers during critical freeway driving maneuvers.
    • To determine the prevalence of 'classical' (eyes precede head) versus 'predictive' (head precedes eyes) eye-head responses.
    • To investigate the relationship between driving experience and the latency of these responses.

    Main Methods:

    • Television cameras recorded eye-head movements of drivers performing left-lane changes, right-lane changes, and entrance merges.
    • Drivers were categorized into three groups: novice, young experienced, and mature.
    • Eye-head responses were classified as 'classical' or 'predictive' based on the order of eye and head movement initiation.

    Main Results:

    • Drivers exhibited a higher frequency of predictive eye-head responses compared to classical responses, approximately twice as often.
    • The average latency for predictive head movements was 90 milliseconds, while classical responses had a latency of 45 milliseconds.
    • No significant relationship was found between the amount of driving experience and the latency of predictive or classical eye-head responses.

    Conclusions:

    • The prevalence of predictive eye-head movements suggests a strategic visual sampling strategy employed by drivers during complex maneuvers.
    • The observed response patterns and latencies indicate efficient information gathering, irrespective of driver experience level.
    • Findings have implications for the design of advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and driver training programs.

    Related Experiment Videos