Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026
Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
Published on: February 10, 2016
Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an
1Department of Otolaryngology, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Two experiments are presented to explain the difference in speech-reception threshold (SRT) between conditions with a steady-state noise masker or an interfering voice. Literature shows for normal hearing a masking release of 6-8 dB with an interfering voice and a substantial reduction of this release with hearing impairment. In experiment I the possible role of comodulation masking release (CMR) is investigated by manipulating the comodulation in the interfering voice by the introduction of temporal shift among filter bands of various width. The spectral spread of masking from the manipulated interfering voice was controlled by interleaving the mutually shifted speech bands with 1/3-octave bands of noise. Although comodulation in the interfering speech appears to be very important for the low SRT, the contribution of across-frequency processing of masker fluctuations--commonly considered as the origin of CMR--is only 1.3 dB. In experiment II the level dependence of masking release with an interfering voice is investigated. The data fit in with the hypothesis by Festen and Plomp [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1725-1736 (1990)] that the release from masking with an interfering voice is limited by forward masking. It appears that up to about 55 dBA the release from masking increases with level up to about 7 dB. Above 55 dBA the difference in SRT obtained with a noise masker or an interfering voice is constant due to the limited average modulation depth of speech.
More Related Videos
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
05:48Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
01:07Interference and Superposition of Waves
Interference occurs in mechanical waves, such as sound waves, waves on a string, and surface water waves. Mechanical waves correspond to the physical displacement of particles. Hence,...
00:53Sound Waves: Interference
01:30Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this barrier...
01:19Masking and Demasking Agents
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on the metal...
01:10Interference: Path Lengths
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
01:06Echo
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...