Related Experiment Videos
Affective comorbidity in panic disorder: is there a bipolar connection?
M Savino1, G Perugi, E Simonini
1II Psychiatric Clinic, University of Pisa, Italy.
Journal of Affective Disorders
|July 1, 1993
Summary
This study explored comorbidity in panic disorder (PD) patients, finding significant links with soft bipolar conditions like hypomania and cyclothymia, alongside depression. These findings suggest a broader understanding of PD
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Psychology
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Comorbidity in panic disorder (PD) is theoretically explained but clinically complex.
- Co-occurrence of panic, obsessive-compulsive, and 'soft' bipolar conditions in PD patients is under-explored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically investigate the intra-episodic and longitudinal comorbidity spectrum in a cohort of panic disorder patients.
- To examine the relationship between panic disorder and anxiety disorders, major depression, and soft bipolar spectrum disorders.
Main Methods:
- A 2-year prospective study of 140 patients diagnosed with DSM-III-R panic disorder.
- Patients were consecutively admitted to an ambulatory psychiatric service.
- Comorbidity was assessed using established diagnostic criteria, including DSM-III-R for panic disorder and agoraphobia.
Main Results:
- Comorbidity with strictly defined anxiety disorders was uncommon (e.g., OCD 4.2%).
- Comorbidity with melancholic Major Depression occurred in 22.9% of PD patients.
- Significant comorbidity was found with soft bipolar spectrum disorders: mania (2.1%), hypomania (5%), cyclothymia (6.4%), and hyperthymic temperament (34.3%).
Conclusions:
- Panic disorder comorbidity extends beyond anxiety and depressive disorders to include soft bipolar spectrum conditions.
- These comorbid patterns may contribute to complex clinical presentations like 'atypical depression' and 'borderline personality'.
- Further research is needed to validate the link between panic disorder and soft bipolar disorders and rule out referral bias.