Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Crime in the workplace

L Goldman

    Occupational Health; a Journal for Occupational Health Nurses
    |June 1, 1993
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Occupational health professionals (OHPs) may face difficult situations when witnessing workplace misconduct. This guidance outlines the OHP's responsibilities when asked to provide evidence of employee wrongdoing.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators.

    JAMA·1996
    Same author

    Correlates of major complications or death in patients admitted to the hospital with congestive heart failure.

    Archives of internal medicine·1996
    Same author

    Cost-effectiveness of routine coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction.

    Circulation·1996
    Same author

    Seriously ill hospitalized adults: do we spend less on older patients? Support Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·1996
    Same author

    The emerging role of "hospitalists" in the American health care system.

    The New England journal of medicine·1996
    Same author

    Changes in health after elective percutaneous coronary revascularization. A comparison of generic and specific measures.

    Medical care·1996
    Same journal

    Preventive health screening in Greece.

    Occupational health; a journal for occupational health nurses·1997
    Same journal

    EU health and safety. A vision for the future.

    Occupational health; a journal for occupational health nurses·1997
    Same journal

    National skin care survey highlights training shortcomings.

    Occupational health; a journal for occupational health nurses·1997
    Same journal

    A case for stress counselling.

    Occupational health; a journal for occupational health nurses·1997
    Same journal

    Management skills--going alone.

    Occupational health; a journal for occupational health nurses·1997
    Same journal

    Legal aspects of teleworking.

    Occupational health; a journal for occupational health nurses·1997
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Occupational Health
    • Workplace Safety
    • Legal Compliance

    Background:

    • Witnessing criminal acts in the workplace presents ethical and professional challenges for Occupational Health Professionals (OHPs).
    • OHPs may be requested to act as witnesses or provide evidence regarding employee misconduct.
    • Navigating these situations requires a clear understanding of professional duties and legal boundaries.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To define the role and responsibilities of OHPs when they witness criminal acts or employee misdemeanours.
    • To provide guidance on how OHPs should respond when asked to provide evidence of workplace misconduct.
    • To ensure OHPs can manage these compromising situations effectively and ethically.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of professional guidelines and ethical codes relevant to OHPs.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of legal frameworks concerning evidence in workplace misconduct cases.
  • Case study examples illustrating potential scenarios and responses.

    • Main Results:

    • OHPs have specific duties when witnessing or being asked to report on employee misconduct.
    • Providing evidence requires careful consideration of professional boundaries and potential conflicts of interest.
    • Clear protocols are necessary for OHPs to follow in such circumstances.

    Conclusions:

    • OHPs must be prepared to handle situations involving workplace misconduct with professionalism and adherence to ethical standards.
    • Understanding their duties is crucial for OHPs to avoid compromising their position.
    • This guidance aims to support OHPs in fulfilling their responsibilities appropriately.