Related Experiment Videos
Revision total hip arthroplasty. Long-term results without cement
J M Lawrence1, C A Engh, G E Macalino
1Anderson Orthopaedic Clinic and Research Institute, Arlington, Virginia.
The Orthopedic Clinics of North America
|October 1, 1993
Summary
Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty with porous implants shows excellent outcomes. This study found low mechanical failure rates and significant improvements in pain, walking, and function for patients.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Reconstructive Surgery
Background:
- Revision hip arthroplasty is complex, often requiring advanced fixation techniques.
- Cementless implants offer potential advantages in long-term stability for revision cases.
- Previous studies show variable outcomes for revision arthroplasty, necessitating further research into cementless options.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of cementless femoral revision arthroplasty using extensively porous coated implants.
- To assess the revision rate, mechanical failure rate, and patient-reported functional improvements.
- To compare the efficacy of this cementless approach with traditional cemented revision arthroplasty.
Main Methods:
- Prospective follow-up of patients undergoing cementless femoral revision arthroplasty.
- Utilized extensively porous coated femoral implants.
- Data collection included revision rates, radiographic loosening, and patient-reported pain, walking status, and functional levels.
- Follow-up duration ranged from 5 to 11 years (mean 7.4 years).
Main Results:
- Low revision rate of 5.7% and radiographic loosening rate of 1.1%.
- Overall mechanical failure rate was 6.9%.
- Significant patient-reported improvements: 89.1% in pain, 82.8% in walking status, and 88.5% in functional level.
- Outcomes favorably compare to cemented revision arthroplasty reports.
Conclusions:
- Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty with extensively porous coated implants demonstrates favorable short- to mid-term clinical and radiographic results.
- This technique offers a low mechanical failure rate and substantial functional improvement for patients.
- The findings suggest this approach is a viable alternative to cemented techniques in revision hip surgery.