Surfactant replacement therapy for pulmonary diseases

Surfactant therapy has clearly been a meaningful addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in the management of premature infants with RDS. Pediatricians and others involved in the care of newborn infants should familiarize themselves with the various surfactant preparations, the indications for their use, the techniques of administration, and the possible side effects. All such care provides should also be skilled in endotracheal intubation and ventilation of neonates; recognition of the clinical and radiographic signs of RDS; and have the appropriate equipment to monitor cardiopulmonary status, oxygenation, and ventilation in these infants until transport to a tertiary care facility can be accomplished. In addition to the two current FDA-approved surfactants, several other surfactants are in various stages of evaluation. When administered to infants with established RDS, both natural and synthetic surfactants have clearly been shown to improve survival, decrease requirements for ventilatory support, and reduce the incidence of air leak complications. Although by no means conclusively demonstrated, certain infants, particularly those delivered at < 30 week gestation, may benefit from immediate treatment in the delivery room. It should be emphasized that, except under extenuating but controlled circumstances and except in the hands of an experienced physician, surfactant treatment should not be viewed as an integral part of neonatal resuscitation. Adequate treatment requires the administration of a minimum of two surfactant doses, although some infants may benefit from additional doses or treatment with an alternative preparation. Massive pulmonary hemorrhage, although rare, is observed with prophylactic and rescue treatment protocols and may result from hemorrhagic pulmonary edema due to a hemodynamically significant PDA. Currently there are no data to recommend the use of one surfactant preparation over another. The short- and long-term benefits may be similar with different products. Therefore, we must await results of trials with then necessary power (large number of subjects) and unbiased design to discern any clinically relevant differences. Results of studies directly comparing the relative efficacy of Survanta and Exosurf, conducted under the auspices of the National Institutes of Health, are expected in 1993. Multicenter trials comparing prophylactic and rescue administration of Exosurf versus CLSE and Survanta versus CLSE are currently underway. It is encouraging to note that follow-up studies up to 2 years of age do not reveal an increase in physical or neurodevelopmental handicaps, BPD, or other problems in preterm infants who received surfactant preparations either for prophylaxis or rescue therapy. Results of long-term follow-up studies, however, are not yet available.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)