Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
Published on: July 25, 2013
Weighting in sequence space: a comparison of methods in terms of generalized sequences
1Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089-1113.
Abstract:
Four methods for weighting aligned biological sequences have recently appeared that differ mathematically, philosophically, and in their results. Thus, while there is consensus about the need to weight sequences, the method to use is contentious. A geometric analysis based on a continuous sequence space is presented that provides a common framework in which to compare the methods. It is concluded that there are two "best" methods. When the sequences are known to be phylogenetically related and a tree can be generated without introducing excessive stress into the data, the method of Altschul et al. [Altschul, S. F., Carroll, R. J. & Lipman, D. J. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 207, 647-653] is appropriate. When the sequences are not known to be phylogenetically related or a tree cannot be produced without unduly distorting the distances between the sequences, a modification of the method of Sibbald and Argos [Sibbald, P. R. & Argos, P. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 216, 813-818] is preferable.
Related Concept Videos
Weighted Mean
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
Per-Unit Sequence Models
Zero-sequence currents, which are identical in magnitude and phase, generate a neutral current, resulting in voltage drops across the neutral impedance and the low-voltage winding. If the...
Sequences
Geometric Sequences
Introduction to Sequences
Convergence of Sequences

