Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Diagnostic decision making in psychiatry

D A Zarin1, F Earls

  • 1Developmental Epidemiology Research Unit, Judge Baker Children's Center, Boston.

The American Journal of Psychiatry
|February 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Psychiatric diagnosis uncertainty is common due to overlapping symptoms. A decision analysis framework helps choose diagnostic methods, improving research relevance for clinicians and policymakers.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Practice guidelines and psychiatric education : potential implications.

Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry·2014
Same author

Community violence and urban childhood asthma: a multilevel analysis.

The European respiratory journal·2010
Same author

Child abuse and performance task assessments of executive functions in boys.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2002
Same author

Community factors supporting child mental Health.

Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America·2001
Same author

The social ecology of child health and well-being.

Annual review of public health·2001
Same author

Is gender a factor in psychiatrists' evaluation and treatment of patients with major depression?

Journal of affective disorders·2001

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Decision Analysis

Background:

  • Psychiatric diagnosis uncertainty is inherent due to overlapping symptoms between affected and unaffected populations.
  • The lack of a single correct method for case definition complicates accurate diagnosis.
  • Structured psychiatric interviews are widely used, but post-interview diagnostic determination receives inadequate attention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the consequences of and propose responses to uncertainty in psychiatric diagnosis.
  • To develop a framework for evaluating different diagnostic schemas.
  • To explore the impact of diagnostic choices on research relevance.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing principles of decision analysis and clinical epidemiology.
  • Developing a framework involving the selection of an external validator, separator, and cutoff.
  • Applying the framework to hypothetical research scenarios to analyze consequences of diagnostic choices.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that the choice of case definition process significantly impacts research relevance for clinicians and policymakers.
  • Highlighted the need for greater attention to diagnostic determination post-information gathering.
  • Showcased how a structured framework can aid in navigating diagnostic uncertainty.

Conclusions:

  • Optimizing the use of research and treatment resources requires increased focus on the diagnostic process.
  • The relevance of psychiatric research is contingent upon careful consideration of diagnostic schema.
  • A systematic approach to diagnostic decision-making is crucial for advancing psychiatric practice and policy.

Related Experiment Videos