Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Detection of Toxin Translocation into the Host Cytosol by Surface Plasmon Resonance
Published on: January 3, 2012
Effects of temperature on ADP-ribosylation factor stimulation of cholera toxin activity
T Murayama1, S C Tsai, R Adamik
1Laboratory of Cellular Metabolism, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Abstract:
The effects of cholera toxin, a secretory product of Vibrio cholerae, result from ADP-ribosylation of the stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding (Gs) protein of the adenylyl cyclase system. Cholera toxin A subunit (CTA) also uses agmatine, a simple guanidino compound, several proteins unrelated to Gs, and CTA itself as alternative ADP-ribose acceptors. The effects of toxin occur in the jejunum presumably at body core temperature. With agmatine as a model substrate, the optimal temperature for CTA-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation was 25-30 degrees C, and that for CTA-catalyzed auto-ADP-ribosylation was 20-25 degrees C. Both activities were significantly less at 37 degrees C, reflecting lower initial velocities, not heat-inactivation of the toxin. All the transferase activities of CTA are enhanced by ADP-ribosylation factors (ARFs), approximately 20-kDa guanine nucleotide-binding proteins that are ubiquitous in mammalian cells. Phospholipids and a soluble brain ARF, in a GTP-dependent manner, activated toxin NAD:agmatine ADP-ribosyltransferase activity; their simultaneous effect was maximal at physiological temperatures (approximately 37 degrees C). At lower temperatures, the stimulation by ARF was much less. There were similar effects on other toxin-catalyzed reactions, notably, the ADP-ribosylation of Gs alpha and the hydrolysis of NAD. Thus, host factors, such as ARF and phospholipid, synergistically increase cholera toxin activity at 37 degrees C and may be important in toxin action in the mammalian gut.
Related Concept Videos
Effects of Temperature on Free Energy
Bacterial Protein Maturation
Stringent Response in E. coli

