Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Malingering on neuropsychological memory tests: potential objective indicators

L C Bernard1, W Houston, L Natoli

  • 1Psychology Department, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045.

Journal of Clinical Psychology
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Public health implications of molecular point-of-care testing for chlamydia and gonorrhoea in remote primary care services in Australia: a qualitative study.

BMJ open·2015
Same author

Silent perforation of the gut wall.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

The aftermath of perforated peptic ulcer.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Silent Perforation of the Gut Wall.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Aftermath of Perforated Peptic Ulcer.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

A multicenter, randomized, placebo controlled, multiple-dose, safety and pharmacokinetic study of AIT-082 (Neotrofin) in mild Alzheimer's disease patients.

Life sciences·2003

This study identified reliable indicators for detecting malingering on memory tests. The Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised and Complex Figure Test/Auditory Verbal Learning Test showed high accuracy in identifying simulated memory impairment.

Area of Science:

  • Neuropsychology
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Forensic Psychology

Background:

  • Malingering, the intentional simulation of cognitive deficits, poses a significant challenge in clinical and forensic evaluations.
  • Accurate detection of malingering is crucial for appropriate diagnosis and treatment planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of five potential indicators for detecting malingering across various memory tests.
  • To identify the most accurate methods for distinguishing genuine cognitive impairment from simulated deficits.

Main Methods:

  • Fifty-seven participants were randomly assigned to either a control group or a simulated malingering group.
  • Performance on the Rey Memory Test (RMT), Hebb's Recurring Digits (HRD), Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R), Complex Figure Test (CFT), and Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) was assessed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discriminant functions were derived from WMS-R and CFT/AVLT scores to classify participants.

    • Main Results:

    • Discriminant functions from the WMS-R and CFT/AVLT achieved high classification accuracy (88% and 86%, respectively).
    • These indicators accurately identified malingerers without misclassifying control participants.
    • The RMT cut-off showed limitations, while the HRD demonstrated some potential for malingering detection.

    Conclusions:

    • The WMS-R and CFT/AVLT offer robust indicators for detecting malingering in memory assessments.
    • Simulated malingering primarily involves suppressing performance on both recall and recognition memory tasks.
    • Further research may refine the utility of RMT and HRD in malingering detection.