Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A hospital experience

D Z Starr1

  • 1Massachusetts General Hospital.

The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, New York
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

A patient shares their experience of a mistaken myocardial infarction diagnosis and coronary care unit admission. This account explores medical biases, patient perception, and the patient experience in healthcare.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Farewell message from Penny A. Asbell, MD, FACS, MBA, Editor-in-Chief of the Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine.

The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York·2012
Same journal

Minority undergraduate programs intended to increase participation in biomedical careers.

The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York·2012
Same journal

Future of electronic health records: implications for decision support.

The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York·2012
Same journal

AA amyloidosis: Mount Sinai experience, 1997-2012.

The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York·2012
Same journal

Amyloid neuropathies.

The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York·2012
Same journal

Should your family history of coronary heart disease scare you?

The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York·2012

Area of Science:

  • Medical error analysis
  • Patient experience research
  • Healthcare system critique

Background:

  • Incorrect diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) can lead to unnecessary intensive care admission.
  • Patient perspectives offer unique insights into healthcare system rigidities and potential biases.
  • Understanding the patient's viewpoint is crucial for improving medical care and reducing diagnostic errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To recount a personal experience of misdiagnosis and coronary care unit admission.
  • To analyze the phenomenon of medical thinking rigidities and belief formation in a clinical setting.
  • To offer observations on being an "exceptional patient" and the subjective experience of medical care.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative narrative analysis of a personal medical experience.
  • Reflective observation on the interaction between patient and healthcare providers.
  • Exploration of cognitive biases and their impact on medical decision-making.

Main Results:

  • The author details the process of being incorrectly diagnosed with myocardial infarction.
  • Observations highlight how medical professionals can adhere to non-factual beliefs.
  • The experience underscores the challenges and strategies of navigating the healthcare system as a patient.

Conclusions:

  • Medical diagnoses require critical evaluation to prevent errors stemming from rigid thinking.
  • Patient advocacy and "exceptional patient" strategies can influence care but do not negate systemic issues.
  • Experiencing medical care from the patient's perspective reveals critical areas for systemic improvement and empathy enhancement.

Related Experiment Videos